monster

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Facts of the case

  • A petition was filed by one Kush Kalra before the Supreme Court seeking its direction to restrain beggars and other homeless people from begging in public places.
  • The reason attributed to the plea was that such acts would result in an increase in the spread of COVID-19.
  • The petition also sought for the rehabilitation of such people.

Petitioner’s Submission

  • The petitioner has filed the present PIL through Advocate Chinmoy Sharma.
  • The PIL contained two prayers:

I) To restrain beggars and other homeless people from begging at traffic junctions and streets to prevent the spreading of COVID-19.
II) To rehabilitate them and to ensure vaccination to protect them from the pandemic.

  • However, the petitioner submitted that the main object of filing the PIL is to seek directions for the second prayer.

Court’s Order

  • The Court did not accept the plea of restraining begging, and therefore it stated that no directions can be passed in this regard.
  • The Bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah observed that the problem of begging is a social and economic one, arising out of poverty. The same cannot be solved by stopping it altogether.
  • The Court agreed to the prayer and acknowledged the need for vaccination to such people.
  • The Bench has issued notice to the Union Government and Delhi directing to file a response on how to deal with this situation, and postponed the matter for two weeks.
  • The Court also directed the petitioner to amend the PIL to clarify its view on prayer.

What are your views on this Judgement?

"Loved reading this piece by Umamageswari Maruthappan?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  33  Report



Comments
img
Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query