LIVE Online Course on NDPS by Riva Pocha and Adv. Taraq Sayed. Starting from 24th May. Register Now!!
LAW Courses

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

COURTS DECISION

  • The High Court has dismissed a petition against delegating the power of Chief Justice (Master of Roster) to Senior Judges in his absence.
  • Based on the petitioners contentions the Court observed that they do not find any merit in the petition for writ which on its face appears to be fundamentally misconceived.
  • The Court furthered observed that the object of the Rule is to make the High Court functional by delegating certain authorities of the Chief Justice to Senior Judge in his absence.


PETIONERS ARGUMENT

  • The PIL was filed by Ashok Pandey, who sought directions for not giving effect to provisions contained in Chapter V Rule 9 of the Allahabad High Court Rules 1952.
  • His argument was that in our Constitutional scheme and the law pronounced by Supreme Court in several cases shows that, the Chief Justice of a High Court is Master of Roster and no other Judge may be allowed to interfere in dispensation of this privileged function.


RESULTS

  • The High Court ordered that no interference at all is warranted on the said matter.
  • The High Court further dismissed the writ petition based on the above mentioned grounds on the 12.04.21

What do you think about this decision by the High Court? Let us know in the comments section below!

"Loved reading this piece by Brazillia Vaz?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  29  Report



Comments
img
Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query