LAW Courses

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Neha @ Pooja Alizad vs.Vaibhav Kumar @ Chetan Sancheti - Jurisdiction Of A Single Judgeis Confined To Grant Relief Under Section 25 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure And He Cannot Invoke Article 142 To Dissolve Marriage By Mutual Consent In A Transfer Petition

Prahalad B ,
  22 September 2021       Share Bookmark

Court :
Supreme Court of India
Brief :

Citation :
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 183/2019


Date of Judgement:
13 September 2021

Coram:
Justice Abhay S. Oka

Parties:
Petitioners – Neha @ Pooja Alizad
Respondent – Vaibhav Kumar @ Chetan Sancheti

Subject

A single judge bench cannot pass orders for dissolution for marriage by invoking its power under Article 142 of the Constitution. Proviso to Rule 1 of Order VI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 states that the jurisdiction of a judge sitting singly is confined to granting relief under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Legal Provisions

  • Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Divorce by Mutual Consent.
  • Article 142 of the Constitution - The Supreme Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it.
  • Section 406 of Code of Criminal Procedure - Power of Supreme Court to transfer cases and appeals.
  • Rule 1 Order VI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 - Subject to the other provisions of these rules, every cause, appeal or matter shall be heard by a Bench consisting of not less than two judges nominated by the Chief Justice.

Overview

  • The Petitioner and Respondent approached a mediator for dissolution of marriage and after complying with the terms and conditions, they prayed for mutual divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act to be read with Article 142 of the Constitution.
  • The Court referred to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, particularly Order VI, and noted that a single bench cannot pass order for dissolution of marriage by invoking Article 142 of the Constitution in a transfer petition unless the Chief Justice exercises his power under Rule 1(iv) Order VI.
  • The Judge directed the Registry to place this case before the Chief Justice.

Issue

  • Whether a Single Judge Bench of the Supreme Court hearing transfer petition can pass orders in nature of mutual consent divorce by invoking Article 142?

Judgement Analysis

  • By a notification dated 11 May 2020, the Supreme Court Rules were amended which specified the matters which can be heard by a Single Judge wherein proviso to Rule 1 Order VI provided that the jurisdiction of a Single Judge is confined to grant relief under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure in a transfer petition and only when the Chief Justice exercises his powers and Rule 1 Clause 4 and notifies about the same.

Conclusion

A Single Judge cannot order for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent by invoking Article 142 of the Constitution in a transfer case. While a Single Judge of the Court can exercise jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to dissolve a marriage, it can only be done subject to Rule 1 of Order VI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

Click here to download the original copy of the judgement

 
"Loved reading this piece by Prahalad B?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"



Published in Others
Views : 434




Comments




LCI Learning Hindu Laws


Latest Judgments


More »


Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query