Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

THIS IS CALLED - EQUAL JUSTICE BEFORE LAW

 

 

The citizens of Union of India whose generations have been exploited for 5000 years under pretext of caste are now notified in the SCHEDULE OF CASTE AND IN THE SCHEDULE OF TRIBE FOR RESERVATION.  Secured job in Government should be given to there next generations for coming 5000 years to those who are SCHEDULED for this reason.  

 

 

THIS IS CALLED "EQUAL JUSTICE BEFORE LAW". 



Learning

 9 Replies


(Guest)


In this context, RESERVATION FOR SC/ST

 

means

 

RESERVED POST FOR EVERY PERSON

 

WHO NOTIFIED IN THE SCHEDULE OF CASTES AND SCHEDULED OF TRIBES.


(Guest)

 

Originally posted by :Ram Samudre-DRF
" In this context, RESERVATION FOR SC/ST

means

RESERVED POST FOR EVERY PERSON

WHO NOTIFIED IN THE SCHEDULE OF CASTES AND SCHEDULED OF TRIBES.
"

 

 

 

Explanation for "RESERVED POST FOR EVERY PERSON"

 

Since EVERYONE OF THEM are exploited.


(Guest)

 

 

Clarification for the claim of period 5000 years

 

The period of exploitation under the pretext of caste should be taken into consideration from the date on which Hindu religion come into existence.  If it is before more than 5000 years in that case the actual period will be considered effective date should be calculated from 26 January 1950 on which the Democratic constitution enforced in the Union of India.

 

THIS IS CALLED - EQUAL JUSTICE AND EQUALITY BEFORE LAW.


(Guest)

 

 

The titles "SCHEDULED CASTE" and "SCHEDULED TRIBE" doesn't mean that the persons belongs to these classes should belongs to any specific religion 

 

 

BUT "SCHEDULE CASTE/TRIBE" means "NOTIFIED SECTIONS' TO WHICH THE PEOPLE BELONGS ARE ELIGIBLE TO HAVE THERE RIGHTS BACK WHICH WERE GRABBED BY EXPLOITERS UNDER PRETEXT OF ANY TYPE OF DISCRIMINATION.

 

 

It is a fake logic that if a person who is notified as SC or ST if changes his/her religion so his/her rights to get their property back from the exploiters, who grabbed under pretext of caste/religion based discrimination, will be withdrawn.  

 

 

THEIR CLAIM STANDS GOOD TO GET BACK/RECOVER THEIR PROPERTY AND WILL BE STAND GOOD TILL WHEN THE SAME IS NOT RECOVERED.


(Guest)

 

And off course; the people who were tagged as "SHOODRA" in Hindus are only SCHEDULED FOR RESERVATION since the Indian democracy is based on SOCIAL EQUALITY and NOT BASED ON ECONOMICAL EQUALITY since they were kept away from their rights under the pretext of UNTOUCHABILITY therefore none other than them are included with special reservation in the constitution. 

 

ALL OTHER CLAIM FOR RESERVATION SUCH UNDER UNJUSTIFIED CLASSIFICATION OF "OBC" ETC IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS MANY OTHER PEOPLE ARE NOW STARTING CLAIMING LIKE "GURJARs" CLAIMING IN RAJSTHAN.


INCLUSION / REVIEW FOR INCLUSION IN SCHEDULED CASTE/TRIBE SHOULD ONLY BE FOR THOSE ARE LEFT SECTIONS WHO WERE TAGGED AS "UNTOUCHABLE CASTES IN HINDUS".


ALL OTHER ARE CAPABLE TO EARN WITH FREEDOM AS PER THEIR WISH AS THEY ARE ALREADY CONSIDERED IN MAIN STREAM OF THE SOCIETY.

 


(Guest)

Friends !


We are citizens of a great democratic nation where every citizen have equal right of freedom of expression.  DRF always welcome free & fair views of everyone even from those who have opposite views too.  Open discussion always helps us to reach to the best outcome.


Therefore, you all are welcomed to participate in the discussion.


Best  regards.


(Guest)

 

More views here;

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Legal-quiz-Religious-base-of-SC-ST-30289.asp?1=1&offset=2

*****

Originally posted by :Arup

"


a person converted to another religion can not claim scheduled caste status

- soosai vs UOI, AIR 1986,SCC 733.

"

 

It can be easily presumed that this judgment is passed by Manuwadi persons by misusing their position as Judge.  As in every section of society judiciary is also captured by Manuwadis.  The UP HC Lucknow Bench's decision on Babri Masjid is an example as how the Hindu judges have passed a baseless order (Everyone knows that it is an order and not a judgment)

 

Anyways, Arup ji, please provide full text of this order (it is also not a judgment) of - soosai vs UOI, AIR 1986,SCC 733 or net link. I will surely challenge it and will prove that this order is not passed "in good faith".


*****

Originally posted by :Ram Samudre-DRF

"


It is a fake logic that if a person who is notified as SC or ST if changes his/her religion so his/her rights to get their property back from the exploiters, who grabbed under pretext of caste/religion based discrimination, will be withdrawn.  THEIR CLAIM STANDS GOOD TO GET BACK/RECOVER THEIR PROPERTY AND WILL BE STAND GOOD TILL WHEN THE SAME IS NOT RECOVERED. 

"

 

 

*****

 

Originally posted by :Arup

"


" Is there any such criteria for scheduled tribe also?"

the straight answer is - no.

where the base of sc is religion ( caste available in hindu society only) ; st based on  triabal area. hindu and christian both are available in st.

i have heared some mohamedan castes declared as sc at rajasthan. can anybody light on it?

actually as per constitution scheduling a perticular caste or tribe is the subject of state goverbnment.

"

 

Contradiction in this matter :

Whereas the caste atrocity is a non bailable severe crime against civil society, WHY NOT Hinduism is treated as the most severe crime against  civil society which is the ROOT CAUSE OF CASTISM???

 

Someone please clarify this contradiction.

 

*****

 

Originally posted by :Ram Samudre-DRF

"

In view of the facts as brought out above, the Government should encourage conversion of religion from Hindu to other religion by the persons who comes under scheduled caste by giving them more other facilities besides reservation. Residential and agriculture land with cash prize of 5 lacs rupees should be given to them.  By such social and national development programmes the India will become free from caste discrimination.

"

 

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     21 January 2011

Dear Sir.Ram, I am of the view that tthe crucial words in the constitution is the word "Discrimination" and discrimination is forbidden: after all we can not make a cat and a Lion to be on the same pedastal, and that is where the State steps in to make them equal by the Constitution itself, otherwise equality as the eddifice of the Constitution will have no meaning. That is why we have the concept of Equal justice for All.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register