Sl-england joint cricketism: can sl pull a win?

SL-England Joint Cricketism: Can SL pull a win?

-DR. ABDUL RUFF

_________

Joint cricket exercises continue to dominate  matches fixed by ICC on behalf of nations. Joint cricketism is as bogus as bribed polls.  

 It appears England is now on top of Sri Lankans as the Sl bowlers  have  beocme growingly humorous. 

After convincingly thrashing the hosts from London who had arrived in Colombo with blessings from Cameron and the Queen, the Lanka boys seem to have decided to obey the Rajapksha orders for offering good runs in the second test to the poor English batboys/openers who have had good “records” of runs in their career, upon somehow being allowed to make 270 runs in the first innings.

Obviously, because English boys want make it sure that the “top” batboys have made enough runs in the first innings itself as the in the first test, they all were cheaply removed form the crease.

The important point here is  not who would win the second test - that is immaterial because the teams must have already decided that and it looks they would like to go for a draw - but how could they offer big runs to select batboys without targeting the stumps/LBW until, of course, towards the end.

Obviously, India, seeking to somehow  climb the bogus ranking ladder,  wants Sri Lanka to lose now. Not only because England would lose its bogus ranking number one.  Indian worry is simple. If Sri Lanka wins, it would replace India as the number 3 rank-holder!

But the rankings records are bogus. Joint Cricketism is bogus!

The cricket  boys of Rajapkash, currently troubled by the allegations of war crimes,  is keeping the England batboys in good humors  in the second test with good runs for every player at the crease. Look at the  latest tally. Every one has crossed 50. 

While SL bowlers and fielders behave like donkeys and moneys, the  post-paid running commentators impatiently waiting for coaktile parties from the teams,  jump in ecstasy. Fantastic, that is how the paid batboys promoters say giving commentaries and  opinions. 

One thing seems to be right watching the testing SL-England joint cricket exercises. SL bowlers are eager to return the runs they got form the England team. Hence, SL bowlers are a bit hurry in offering runs to Egnlish hosts while  the hosts were too slow in  letting the SL boys make runs. 

 SL team feel that  their batobys  got more than what they are in fact capable of  and  feel positv e for the guests from London bolwers  for feeding sumptuously the Combo batboys.  SL bowlers clearly feel for the Englsish  bowlers for feeding  the SL batobys with one 100 plus for the captain and two 50s for  others. SL bowlers, therefore, are so pleasd with London’s bowling performace that they also decided to be  reciprocte in similar terms.  SL has given  three  50 plus and but Cokk’s dining taqble was clered by Dilshan when Cook awas almost ready to eat the full ckae  with 100 plus.  Cook returned ot pavilion unmistaenly disppointed bboys.

So, one 100 plus is due from  SL bowlers for the Egnlash batobys and in the second innings perhaps SL boys would complete the “task”.  

One might ask: why should not the teams annunce their 100 plus agneda in advnace so tht the matchesw oudl be interesting. 

Can't cricket be played without  sharing 100, 50 etc between or among the teams? 

Does the  bogus ICC think it can't be otherwise?