Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

section 138 of negotiable instruments act

Page no : 2

Dharmesh Manjeshwar (Advocate/Lawyer)     24 July 2010

I doubt whether there is such a judgement of the apex court ........

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     26 July 2010

Is it a verification statement u/s 200 of CrPC. Read the attached judgement and please comment.

 

VERIFICATION

I, _____________, age _____, occupation business, residing at __________ do hereby state on solemn affirmation that in pursuance of existing liability s mentioned in complaint,

accused has issued three cheques ______________.

That on _____ all three cheques were presented in our bank account. On _____ the bank returned all three cheques with remarks NOT ARRANGED FOR.

Therefore notice was issued to the accused on _____. The accused have not paid the amount of ____. Hence it is requested that process be issued against accused.

Sd/ Complainant.

Before Me

Sd/ MM


Attached File : 49 49 judge oka s judgement.doc downloaded: 109 times

mazharul (Advocate)     28 July 2010

Can you provide me with the Indian SC guideline about cheque dishonored case


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register