The lawyers are practically spell bound infront of Judge. Its when he was silent and I saw its slipping, that I had to speak. Its not only me. I see most of the cases the lawyer from Husband side is one on recieving end. No matter how senior the lawyer is.
In my hearing he literally threw my application of Order XI rule 12, where I asked court direct wife to furnish her salary slips. Finally my application never made to docket procedings and was not served to wife.
When I refer to court judgements, he just said that he is not bound to look upon these judgements. He even abused me that don't show net savy smartness in court , given that I cited 4-5 judgements. Following judgments where quoted in memo
1: Judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court of Indiain case of M/S S.J.S. Business Enterprises Vs State Of Bihar & Ors. ( Unclean hands no relief ).
2: Judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Allahabadin case of Syed Nazim Husain Vs. The Additional Principal Judge Family Court & another. ( perjury in sec 24 for suppressing salary)
3: Judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana in case of Sunny Bhumbla Vs Shashi Bhumbla. ( perjury for suppressing income).
4: Judgement of Hon’ble Family court of Mumbai in Exh 56 in case A/2050 of 2010. ( perjury & interrogatories served to wife to get salary details).
5: Judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in case of Manish Kumar vs Pratibha , CM(M) 949/2008. ( sec 24 denied , not for equivalizing income of both parties)
6: Judgement of Hon'ble M.P. High Court reported in 2 (2000) DMC 170 in the case of Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Rajesh Jaiswal ( qualified wife not entitled for maintenance)
He just wrote that facts and circumstances in the above is different from the present case.