but the problem that remains is who is going to do so ,because the term remains relative,say x no of people are happy under the A government
but y no is not
for them it will become a violation of fundamental right
but x no of people will say that we are happy and no breech took place.
Now in that y no of people you have say B,C,D political parties,
in the next term when B comes to power ,z no of people from earlier y no of people will fill happy
on the other hand (y-z)+ x no of people will now become vocal about the term good governance.
In my openion good Governance is a collective term for all the fundamental and legal rights as enshrined in constitution
so in any way when ever there is a violation of rights we can file a specific case to invoceArticle 32/226 as and when required.
In my openion this is the reason why such can not form a part of the fundamental right.
thanks for the topic .