Yes of-course.....I had mentioned how the Hon'ble judge did not accepted my lawyers vakalat Nama which was submitted on 21st Oct 2011. Since that nither its menioned on Roznama, where its niether accepted nor rejected. But in Order its mentioned that -"Heard the Learned Advocates of both the respective parties"
if Vakalatnama is not mentioned in Roznama, then how come then the Hon'ble Court heard will delivery/deciding the interim maintenance???????????
Also it is submitted that the Respondent is Heart Patient suffered from Vasospatic Angina still the Hon'ble Judge ketp dates with 4-8 dates interval.
Not accepting the applications submitted by me or by my advocate..every time when my advocate appeared his attendance is not marked, but when the interim was decided its mentioned that Non applicatants advocated present.
there are lots of grivenances against the Judge mentioned in Petition, also the complaint letter has been sent to Registrar HC and SC.