LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar (Nil)     07 January 2011

Powers of Labor Commissioner

Is Labor Commissioner competent to decide as to whether a person is "workman" within the meaning of Industrial Disputes Act ?


 4 Replies


Under ID Act, the Labour Commissioner can not be a competent authority to decide whether a person is workmen or not.Only the Labour Court is competent authority to adjudicate such issues.This is with reference to Tamilnadu.Labour Commissioner is competent to decide whether  the establishment is a shop or not under TN Shops and establishment Act and also he is competent to decide whether any industry is seasonal or otherwise 

1 Like

V. VASUDEVAN (LEGAL COUNSEL)     08 January 2011


17 SEP 2010

Labour Commissioner cannot decide who is workmen: Supreme Court



Hugely restricting the scope of Labour Commissioners, the Supreme Court in a recent decision has declared that it is beyond the prerogative of Labour Commissioner to decide upon the fact as to whether a particular person is a workman in order to be amenable to the labour and industrial legislations. Declaring the law to this effect, the Bench inter alia observed as under;
13. We are faced by the question as to whether a person is a workman or not could be said to be related to the applicability and interpretation of the Standing Orders along with the issue of whether the orders of transfer and subsequent termination were justified or not. As far as the labour Commissioner is concerned, he is only a ‘Conciliation Officer’ as envisaged under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and ‘Certifying Officer’ under the Standing Orders. The Standing Orders, particularly Clause ‘W’, vests the Labour Commissioner with the jurisdiction and power to decide on the applicability and interpretation of the Standing Orders. On the other hand, Section 11-C of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Section 13A of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 grant the power and jurisdiction to render a decision on the issue of interpretation and application of the Standing Orders to the Labour Court.
14. Without going into the issue as to whether such a power and jurisdiction could be vested on the Labour Commissioner, we may decide the issued raised herein from another angle. The issue of whether or not a person is a ‘workman’ within the meaning of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is a matter to be decided by a competent court, after allowing the parties to lead evidence. Thereafter, on proper appreciation of the materials on record including the oral evidence, a decision could be rendered and the issue could be determined. The enquiry before the Labour Commissioner is of a summary nature and while exercising such a power of summary nature, the Labour Commissioner cannot decide and examine factual matters relating to an issue as to whether or not the person concerned is a workman or not. 
15. In the case of Sharad Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, reported at (2002) 4 SCC 490, an issue regarding whether or not a person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 came for consideration before this Court. This Court held that in such a matter the State Government could not arrogate upon itself the power to adjudicate such an issue in as much as the same could be determined by the Industrial Tribunal or the Labour c court on the basis of the materials to be placed before it by the parties. In this instance, the Division Bench has erroneously held that the aforesaid issue is an ancillary issue to the issue of  applicability and interpretation of the Standing Order.
16. Whether or not a person is a workman is a matter that relates primarily to facts and circumstances of the case. The same has nothing to do with the application and interpretation of the Standing Orders. What needs to be examined and looked into for deciding the aforesaid  issue is the nature of job performed by the concerned person, duties and responsibilities vested on him and other such relevant material. In our considered opinion, the Division Bench of the High Court committed a mistake in determining the said issue as an ancillary to that of the applicability and interpretation of the Standing Order. A perusal of the earlier Writ Petition filed by the respondent no. 1 numbered as Writ Petition No. 8630 of 2008 would indicate that what was also challenged in the said writ petition was the order of termination passed against the respondent. The order of termination also could not have been examined and scrutinized as such power and jurisdiction is not vested with the Labour Commissioner.
1 Like

Kirti Kar Tripathi (lawyer)     16 January 2011

Labour Commissioner  is Act as a representative of appropriate government  while  exercising the powers of Industrial Disputes Act, he can hold meeting for collective bargaining, conciliation and send his failure report to the Government.  The determination of determination of status of an employee as to workman involve adjudication after adducing the evidence by the parties, which a question of fact and is exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal, where the case was referred. 

1 Like

Lorax Michael (N A)     13 August 2014

If an employee registered the complaint aginst the company to the concerned Labour commissioner of his area that he has been exploit by the company on racial ground.


Do the commissioner have the power to investigate this matter and file the report to the goverment.


or it does not come into their jurisdiction.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register