Nishikant (nishikant.bansode@gmail.com) 26 February 2011

Order VI Rule 17 or CPC

Atmaram & Sakharam are the defendants in the suit filed by their brother Tukaram for declaration that sale deed between Atmaram & Sakharam and one Vijay Jadhav in respect of the part of his ancestral property is not binding upon him & for partition . After filing WS, defendants now want to seek an amendment in written statement & want to insert a paragraph about the gift deed executed by defendant’s mother to the defendant’s prior to institution of suit.

Ref: Order VI Rule 17 or CPC We have to Defend this case

Reply Follow

3 Replies

Amarnath Vibhute (Sr. Partner ) 27 February 2011

this is not the way to study. pl refer mulla and mulla on cpc and get your answers. instant food will not make you good professioanl.

valentine thakkar (advocate) 01 March 2011

Dear

Order VI Rule 17 : The Court may at any stage of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary for for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties...

This includes alteration/amendment in the WS as well if the same is likely to affect the whole case or change the direction of the case.