if once the case has been registered U/S 138 & 142 NEGOTIABLE INTRUMENT ACT,
the accused not responding to any legal notice, & the court ordered summons, and then he appear, & said
he is not taken that much amount of money, and also both(accused & complaint) the parents father came to
court decided & also requested to court to go for compromise, as per the guidelines of the magistrate
odered to bring the money first then talk, but the complaint refused, because accused not paying check
amount, he as given 2 checks, one check is small amount and another one is big total is 4.25 lakhs, small
amount check, accused done perfect signature and another one intensionaly done a mistake in a signature,
also the bank given an endorsement as a "insuficient fund" check is dishonor for both checks,
actually accused maitaining a/c balance "zero" several months & also holding a check book, againest the
banking rules, because he is undergraduate in "commerce" passed, and also peculiar konwledge in
BUSINESS STUDIES, his marks card itself is an evidence,
the greatest master mind is used in one check "variation inks" there is no altration in amount in the box, and
written in words, and also dates, signature.
accused is fail to prove complainant is unkown person, he didn't make any trasaction with the complainant,
evidence stage is over, complainant submitted his 2 bank account annual statement turn over on his
(professional small scale industry business) exact 7.20 lakhs one is
(current account & another one is saving bank account), and also mentioning accused name in his account
statement before taking a loan he his taken very small amount of money exact 1,000/- and another one is
1500/-, before taking a loan "money" proved accused is known person,
waiting for cross exam, and also complainant not done any income tax file, because of his confusion,
because his mother is propriater, transaction done by his son, he his the only one person konw the entire
business and also work,
now he his ready to pay income tax as per the guidelines of ADVOCATES & ALSO RULES , if get only his
loss amount 4.25 lakhs,
whether the complainant is recover the amount or not..................!
is there any citation for this U/S 138 NEGOTIABLE ACT............................................................!
DESPARATLY WAITING FOR PECULIAR SOLUTIONS.