Upgrad LLM

moot court problem

F&B Secretary

Vidhi Pradesh is a state in the Indian Union. Nyaya Kumar is a lawyer practicing in the High Court of vidhi Pradesh.  In 2005 , Nyaya Kumar opened a web page on the internet.  The web page at http://www.lawindia.com provides information regarding the academic qualification of the advocate Nyaya Kumar, areas of specialization, facilities available in his office, telephone numbers and fax numbers, particulars of legal services provided by him etc.

On 20.3.2005, one Mr. Chanakya filed a complaint before the Bar Council of Vidhi Prades, alleging that Advocate Nyaya Kumar had committed professional misconduct.  I was pointed out that Nyaya Kumar had violated Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules dealing with the Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette, by way of giving advertisement in the internet under the pretext of opening a web page.

The Disciplinary Committee of the State Bar council conducted an inquiry in accordance with the Provisions of Advocates Act. 1961 and the Bar council Rules and on 16.10.2006 it was decided to suspend Mr. Nyaya Kumar from practice for a period of 2 years.

Nyaya Kumar files an appeal against the decision.

 

Can anybody help me out with the arguments pls???

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

CrPC MASTERCLASS!     |    x