Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Job fraud

Page no : 2

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     21 October 2014

@Mr Helping Hand

you have to agree that his marriage is a trap though laid by him only.

madhu (HR Manager)     21 October 2014

Mr. Sudir and Mr.Helping hand please go thru my queries...

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     22 October 2014

do you think we are your munshis who will search arund the site to see facts of you case.  That too while you mispell my name.

fighting back (exec)     22 October 2014

impression marne ke chakkar me aab court ke chakkar lagaa.............90% of men do this kind of act just to impress the girl and the family, what the hell is the need to boast about something which you dont have........as if this was the last girl on the planet to get married to......this is the biggest problem with boys. trying to boost their fake egos...............now 

fighting back (exec)     22 October 2014

...........and on second thoughts, guys like you should face the music and punishment in courts because this is what happens when you create false impressions on women and give them an opportunity to accuse the male gender of being born cheaters and dowry seekers, you are just another addition to that list.......may you face music in court and a suitable punishment for taking marriage too lightly ......helping hand has correctly analysed you..................and just because you have managed a team in UK under you, prove that you are a very intelligent man.........

madhu (HR Manager)     22 October 2014

you all please go thru the following verdict by Delhi High Court... Mr. Sudhir Kumar / Helping Hand / Fighting Back .

29 AUG 2010

No maintenance by non-working husband: High Court

 

 

In a judgment which can bring relief to a number of unemployed husbands from the liability to pay maintenance to their wives, the Delhi High Court recently has declared that the law relating to maintenance to be paid to wives under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply in a situation where the husband is unemployed and isn't himself earning. Deciding in Sanjay Bhardwaj v. State, the Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra reversed the decision of the lower court fixing maintenance in such circumstances.

The High Court inter alia observed;
 

4. ... Under prevalent laws i.e. Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, Hindu Marriage Act, Section 125 Cr.P.C - a husband is supposed to maintain his un-earning spouse out of the income which he earns. No law provides that a husband has to maintain a wife, living separately from him, irrespective of the fact whether he earns or not. Court cannot tell the husband that he should beg, borrow or steal but give maintenance to the wife, more so when the husband and wife are almost equally qualified and almost equally capable of earning and both of them claimed to be gainfully employed before marriage. If the husband was BSc. and Masters in Marketing Management from Pondicherry University, the wife was MA (English) & MBA. If the husband was working as a Manager abroad, the wife with MBA degree was also working in an MNC in India. Under these circumstances, fixing of maintenance by the Court without there being even a prima facie proof of the husband being employed in India and with clear proof of the fact that the passport of the husband was seized, he was not permitted to leave country, (the bail was given with a condition that he shall keep visiting Investigating Officer as and when called) is contrary to law and not warranted under provisions of Domestic Violence Act.
5. We are living in an era of equality of s*xes. The Constitution provides equal treatment to be given irrespective of s*x, caste and creed. An unemployed husband, who is holding an MBA degree, cannot be treated differently to an unemployed wife, who is also holding an MBA degree. Since both are on equal footing one cannot be asked to maintain other unless one is employed and other is not employed. As far as dependency on parents is concerned, I consider that once a person is grown up, educated he cannot be asked to beg and borrow from the parents and maintain wife. The parents had done their duty of educating them and now they cannot be burdened to maintain husband and wife as both are grown up and must take care of themselves. 
6. It must be remembered that there is no legal presumption that behind every failed marriage there is either dowry demand or domestic violence. Marriages do fail for various other reasons. The difficulty is that real causes of failure of marriage are rarely admitted in Courts. Truth and honesty is becoming a rare commodity, in marriages and in averments made before the Courts.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register