How will the court view fil's statement?

you can always emphasize on proof of ownwership of gold by father in law . You have to prove that so much of gold was never given . Court needs evidence to belive in statements if you produce evidence that so much gold was never given . It will change the complexion of the case.

Thanks, that is fine that  the burden of proof is on FIL that the 55 tola gold was given to me as he may stand fake witnesses in the court who will lie but then we can always cross them.  But from where I get the evidences about the non existent  55 tola gold which was never given to me. The marriage video clip shows only a couple of ornaments and those all were taken while wife left home. Basically we are on the soup for those things which were never given or demanded by me or my parents. I also filed a few complaints to CP and senior police officials and CAW Cell regarding taking away jewelry while she left home     

Now please advise briefly so that I can rebuttal the case properly.

Regards

The onus of proof is on you.