lissing perme (unemployed) 10 August 2013

Help

Respected Members

Can any body help me know the fate of judgement of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in UPSC Vs N Sugathan(LPA-797/2011), UPSC vs Nareah Kumar( LPA-802/2011), UPSC Vs Gurhari Kamila ( LPA-803/2011 )and UPSC Udaya Kumara(LPA 810/2011) at Supreme Court of India.

Heard that UPSC Appeal against the Judgement of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Supreme Court.

Thanks in advance.

Reply Follow

2 Replies

Suri.Sravan Kumar (senior) 10 August 2013

LPA 797,802,803&810 all of 2011

Page

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision:

December

, 2011

LPA 797/2011

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

..... Appellant

Through

Mr. Naresh Kaushik &

Ms. Amita

Kalkal Chaudhary,

Adv.

versus

N SUGATHAN

..... Respondent

Through

None.

AND

LPA 802/2011

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

...

.. Appellant

Through

Mr. Naresh Kaushik & Ms. Amita

Kalkal Chaudhary, Adv

versus

NARESH KUMAR

...

.. Respondent

Through

None.

AND

LPA 803/2011

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

..... Appellant

Through

Mr. Naresh Kaushik & Ms. Amita

Kalkal Chaudhary, Adv.

versus

GOURHARI

KAMILA

..... Respondent

Through

None.

AND

LPA 810/2011

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

..... Appellant

Through

Mr. Naresh Kaushik & Ms. Amita

Kalkal Chaudhary, Adv.

versus

UDAYA KUMARA

..... Respondent

LPA 797,802,803&810 all of 2011

Page

Through

None.

CORAM :

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

, J.

Notices of the appeals were issued. None of the respondents appear

nspite of service

;

however in LPA 797/2011 a letter dated 1

December,

2011 has been received from the respondent stationed at Kerala informing

that he

s unable to appear because of ailments

;

in LPA 810/2011

a counter

affidavit has been filed by the resp

ondent.

It is not expedient to await the

respondents any further and we have heard the counsel for the appellant

UPSC

These

intra

appeals

though against separate orders and

different

respondents, are taken up

together since all entail the

same questi

on of

exemptions available to the appellant

UPSC

under the Right to Information

Act, 2005.

LPA 797/2011

LPA 797/2011 is preferred against the order dated 4

May, 2011 of

the learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) No. 2918/2011 preferred by

the appell

ant UPSC. The said writ petition

was preferred impugning the

order dated 14

February, 2011 of the Central Information Commission

(CIC) directing the appellant UPSC to disclose to the respondent

therein

Suri.Sravan Kumar (senior) 10 August 2013

visit Delhi High court site and click judgements.

Related Threads

Start a New Discussion Unreplied Threads

Popular Discussion

Help

2 Replies

Leave a reply

Recent Topics

Related Threads

Popular Discussion

Browse by Category

Download LCI APP

Our Network Sites