LIVE Course on Transfer Property Law | Price Hike in 4 days | Grab it now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Hemant Agarwal (ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108)     19 April 2009

HC orders cops to pay for illegal detention

Dear All,
The following appeared in  "Times of India", Mumbai Edition on April 18, 2009, page no. 01.

The law (Bombay HC) recognises High Handed nuisance of the Law Enforcing Agencies.  The news paper cutting should be circulated to all the police stations and criminal lawyers to ensure future restrictions on such nuisance by the police dept.

Keep Smiling ... HemantAgarwal
09820174108

 

HC orders cops to pay for illegal detention

Mumbai: Navi Mumbai police commissioner Ramrao Wagh on Friday apologized to the Bombay high court for detaining a resident of the area for nine months on the basis of 24 false cases. Not satisfied with only a “sorry’’ from Wagh, the division bench of Justice Ranjana Desai and Justice Rajesh Ketkar said that prima facie it was a case of “gross negligence’’, and asked the Maharashtra government to pay Rs 10,000 as compensation to the detainee, Pawan Arora. This is the first time in the history of criminal justice in the state that compensation has been awarded in a detention case, as the stringent law gives “immunity’’ to police who approve such orders.
   “The entire police department has to realize that you cannot sit in your chambers and churn out detention orders,’’ thundered Justice Desai. “A person cannot be deprived of his liberty without trial in a lighthearted manner. Preventive detention orders are drastic laws and have to be used with care and circumspection.’’ The judges made it clear that the order of compensation should not be treated as a precedent, but was meant for the “peculiar’’ facts of the case.
   Wagh, who was present in court, told the judges that he had acted “in good faith’’, but passed the buck to his juniors, saying that he had relied on the documents prepared by subordinates. He further said departmental action had been initiated against the officers concerned, namely senior inspector S Dubal and inspector Tanaji Patil, then attached to the APMC police station.

Detaining officials can’t pass buck to juniors: Court

Mumbai: A Bombay high court division bench of Justice Ranjana Desai and Justice Rajesh Ketkar was not convinced by Navi Mumbai police chief Ramrao Wagh’s explanation that local resident Pawan Arora was wrongfully detained for several months on the basis of documents prepared by Wagh’s subordinates. “A detaining authority cannot abdicate his responsibility and rely only on his subordinates,’’ said the judges.
   During the last hearing of the case, another bench of the court had taken away all Wagh’s powers to pass detention orders. On Friday, the court restored those powers, but asked him to be careful in future.
   Wagh had ordered Arora’s detention on May 16, 2008, under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act (MPDA). The order cited 28 cases allegedly filed against Arora. Nearly nine months later, on January 23, 2009, the HC quashed the detention order after it found that 24 of those cases did not involve Arora. The court said though Arora had a criminal past, it was wrong of the police to put him behind bars on the basis of false cases.
   Last month, Arora moved the HC seeking Rs 2 lakh as compensation. The HC has now asked the state to circulate its order to the entire police machinery in Maharashtra.



Learning

 4 Replies

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     19 April 2009

Dear Hemasnt,

                                   Thank you for ther valuable information:

Shree. ( Advocate.)     19 April 2009

Dear  Hemant,

Thanks for  this report .Where as in many(most) cases a person is just put inside the lock-up and then questioned (or harassed/humiliated etc. etc.). Only when the police have a solid case is a case registered, the "arrest" made and documents prepared. Thanks to this practise in many states when news paper reports have sentences like - "the suspects are under police surveillance", or "the suspects would be in the police net soon" it pretty much means that "the suspect is already in the police lockup and singing like a canary" 8).

K.C.Suresh (Advocate)     20 April 2009

What Shree said is correct. Thyis survilance is a clear violation of law and in actuial situation an illegal custody. But no body cares this violation even the Court. Sorry to say that the amendments in Cr.p.C and the attitude of courts are now creating a socity of police raj. I wonder what happend to our judiciary whenm there were V.R. Krishna Iyyer and others who stood in high hights with iron hand to stop police violations. A compenstion or punishment is not sufficient. But must be watch dogs of law. The defence also must get fair chances as prosecution which now lacking.

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     21 April 2009

It will be good if the same can be circulated to all the DGs of Police through out the Country.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading
Start a New Discussion Unreplied Threads



Popular Discussion


view more »




Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query