about questions !

It should not hurt Dr. What you said is correct. We are here to answer the querry not to study others about the law as a law teacher. So your suggetion is healthy and welcome

when  Advocate or members  are asking opinion  from other advocates/members  , the facts of  the subject  should be in detail and there should not be any scope  for  treatignt  the subject as pertainign to ------- '''' 

The issue be posted in detaile with relevant facts ,  enabling the member to give  required reply  

hi  sir

if lower court granting  temprory injuction on ground that there is primafacie case.......in following matter

there is case that plantif say that  defedant acquire property by therating her parents,but there is registerd sale deed,then what would haapen in that matter?

this forum is most popular than ors. by reaso.n of its diversity.last seven months our sr advocate members dedicated enough for improvement. out of many thanks to mr assumi, shree , prakash , suresh ,kiran kumar and ors.since students are also interested ,some academic discussion must be incorporated along with problem related conference.thanks to all "with whom i converse day   by day".

 to prof pratihar,

of course sir ! there should be academic discussion also and students can not be expected to be so acurate in formulating the questions. such type of questions should be posted in the column of student or learning spot.

but when there is a query of a lawyer on real litigation, the qustion must be exact formulated and relevant fact must be provided so as to avoid speculations about facts and applicability of law.

Mr V N Thirpati view  regarding   academic discussions and lawyers  discussions , is correct

I too agree with Dr. Tripathi.