I am finding any judgment which says that the every document which is in judicial file wheather its a marked or EX should be read
could you plz help me to do so
Advocate B. M. (Advocate) 31 March 2011
provisions of chapter V Evid. Act needs to be complied for the document to be read in evidence.
shankar (advocate) 31 March 2011
a document has to be proved by following proper procedure as per evi. act. merely giving ex. no. is not sufficient to read the document in evidence. a judgement is there in mhlj 2010 june or july issue on same issue. adv. s d ratnaparkhi pune.
pratik (self working) 31 March 2011
I would also like to have the case laws but it has been also said that every govenmnt document need not be exhibit whether in criminal, civil or any writ petition . also meaning of exhibit why the dcuments are exhibit ?
Whehter exhibit system is applicable in every proceedings whether civil or criminal SLP, Writ petition appellate stage also ? as i am
(asking this kind of a question i.e.(the meaning of exhibit & where it is necessary to exhibit th evey document whih we have to present in the any court or tribunal) ? Becasue no law as per my view has defined the word exhibit & why the document should be exhibited ? )
PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 03 April 2011
AS PER EVIDENCE ACT YOU CAN MARK DOCS WHICH ARE AUTHONTICATIVE PROOFS IN THE EYE OF LAW. SOME TIMES PHOTO COPIES ALSO TAKEN AS EX- x and marked as evidences for trail /cross purpose.