Upgrad LLM

cross examination in divorce case

zz

Husband applied for divorce HMA (13 ia, cruelty) with ADJ court. Next date is for petitioner- evidence. Now the procedure is new to me & lawyer’s version does not appeal much……so kindly throw light:

1) He has prepared 11 pages affidavit & plan to submit it there. Almost copy-paste of original petition. He says “cross-examination” is not a big deal & opposite lawyer will perform it on the same day within 10 min.

I have apprehension about cross examination, is it usual formality as he is telling? Or I have to prepare myself for rigorous viva?

2) Can the opposite lawyer take time to read my affidavit n do cross on next date?

3) My lawyer says that ADJ remains busy in his cases while parties dictate their evidence & opposition does CROSS standing near the steno/clerk. Is it so?

Somehow, I have different picture of court proceedings about evidence + cross………………may be due to hype shown in Hindi Movies?

 
Reply   
 
Senior Partner

Ha ha u r so right it makes me laugh (not on you but on overload of courts)


1
. Affidavit is supposed to be given copy of to o/p few days before so that he can come prepared otherwise if given same day then the evidence will be differed for next date by o/p citing that hazoor abhi diya hai affidavit in ho ney aab mai kya karo!.BANG matter adjourned for next date TRING TRING maint. meter is still ON as per adjourned date if she has applied for maint. against your divorce remember that !!!!


2. Yes the scene is more cozy than fiction and it usually happens before the steno and rest apprehensions are right unless ld. PO is pro-active and less burden on the date then a ld. PO is required to take the charge of putting his Rules here and there during cross examination by keeping open your file and w/s in front of him.


3. You see other than visiting court just to see at one time your lovely wife only on your court dates (just like what I mentioned under quotes in opening second line in my profile) do visit at random different courts and experience first hand cross examination be it happening in some other matters under some other act/code. You will remove inhibition of developing cold feets. I mean it is a lovely experience for all laymen’s.


BTW what you alleged and what rebuttal she mentions is what is asked in tricky way to elicit doubts on your statements and demolish your 50:50 allegations So develop Rhino skins and compose yourself say only minimum as reply and ensure any extra words that you speak is entered in your Statement as (voluntarily….blah ….blah….bang…blah……bang….) Read your statement at the end and then only sign recalling you did actually say all that Ramayana afterall otherwise later on you will come here saying ld. PO was biased and colluded with your lovely wife side and cross examination statement was not what actually you gave kar key .....


Total likes : 1 times

 
Reply   
 


Practicing Advocate

I do not know from which place you are where ADJ remains busy in his cases while parties dictate their evidence & opposition does CROSS standing near the steno/clerk.... !!!!  at least I would like to know for the sake of knowledge where such things happens.. !

May be in some cities this is happening, whereas in our maharashtra, the cross-examination is strictly dictated by the judge to the steno and I haven't seen a single case where parties dictate their evidence to the steno...

Anyways, do not take cross examination lightly and submitting an affidavit of evidence which is a replica of the petition is also not a good idea. Length of the cross depends upon facts and circumstances of every case. So it may be just 10 minutes or in some cases many many more minutes, an hour or more. However, you go through the affidavit. Discuss things with your advo before submitting yourself to the cross examination, he may give you some good tips depending upon the facts of your case. Do not give any 'admissions' which are hazardeous to you i.e those which will go against you. Deny the suggessions / versions which are imputing some cruelty or allegations against you.


Total likes : 2 times

 
Reply   
 
Advocate

Originally posted by :Adv Archana
"
I do not know from which place you are where ADJ remains busy in his cases while parties dictate their evidence & opposition does CROSS standing near the steno/clerk.... !!!!  at least I would like to know for the sake of knowledge where such things happens.. !

 
"

 In Delhi almost all courts follow the same procedure except one or two judges.

@Rajiv, 

Had I been your counsel I would have done the same thing except to hand over the advance copy of the affidavit to the opposite counsel one-two weeks before the date of evidence, so that the opposite counsel read it and come with preparation.  Before the cross examination,  You must read your affidavit thoroughly:  there are admitted facts by both the parties, if the opposite counsel will put any question on such fact (for the time passing), your counsel object it on the ground of admitted fact.  In respect of disputed questions of fact- the opposite counsel (if he is good enough) will not ask direct questions, but put questions surrounding the fact.  If it is relevant, you have to answer them.  If he goes far away from the question of fact and ask far fletched questions, then your counsel will object it as "irrelevant question".  Even then, the opposite counsel insists to put such question, your counsel will address the judge and the judge there itself will decide whether it is irrelevant or relevant question.  If it is ruled as irrelevant you need not reply.

Put confidence in your advocate.


Total likes : 2 times

 
Reply   
 
solve problems in criminal cases. lawproblems@gmail.com

It is all India practice that the judge dictates the evidence, otherwise not possible any where.

cross is important where the opposite advocate will demolish your evidende.

 

take care.

 
Reply   
 
member and secretory

(1) you should remember all facts/dates of incidence of case.give. listen -think and then speak.take time to ans. tacktile questions by asking opposite concil for a repeat of question etc.                                                              (2)he may take or may not be.                                                                                                                                                (3) it is so in most of sdjm/adjm courts.                                                                                                                            (4)hindi movies shows the courts as of highcourt/s.court.

 
Reply   
 
Practicing Advocate

Originally posted by :Adv. Chandu 09868332610
"
 In Delhi almost all courts follow the same procedure except one or two judges.
 
 

Procedure....???   :P


Total likes : 2 times

 
Reply   
 
Advocate

when one observes the proceedings of evidence, there does not appear any violation of procedure laid down in CPC, Cr.P.C. and evidence Act as during the evidence the judge, while busy dealing with other cases, will give one or two glances towards the steno, counsels of both the parties or at one or two times intervene and change the words here and there in deposition.  At the end, the witness and the judge sign the deposition and so there is no violation of procedure.  If the cross-examining advocate  shows his inability to dictate the answers delivered by the witness in Hindi into English, then the judge grumblingly keep his other files away and involve himself in the process of evidence.  


Total likes : 1 times

 
Reply   
 
Practicing Advocate

No Mr Chandu, I am unable to agree with you because both the CPC and CrPC expects that the evidence should be recorded by the judge either himself or or by his dictation to the steno. Yes it is written that the judge may record the evidence under the direction and personal supervision the evidence may be taken by the officer of the court appointed by him in this behalf for reasons to be recorded. But this clearly does not mean that and should not be interpreted as that the job is to be left to the steno and the advocates.......and that it is OK that the judge can be 'busy' in dealing with other cases and give one or two glances towards the steno at his whims will be enough..... . Recording of evidence is a serious bussiness and not to be taken so lightly just to complete the formality. A judge has to put his mind in the case while recording the evidence and see the relevancy of the questions, demanour of the witness etc not to be just left to the other party advocates to take objections and then the judge will see about it. Supporting and encouraging such a practice will not be proper.


Total likes : 1 times

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

CrPC MASTERCLASS!     |    x