What does the HC judgement mean?
Does it imply that ex-parte divorce decree winner was NOT supposed to challenge the set-aside application by wife?
Husband must have contested the set aside plea by wife.
That's why judge might have given an elaborate chance to wife to prove the genuinity of her condonation excuse.
This has underlined that 'ex-parte' decrees arediscardable by paying fines.
Husband should have remained absent for the 'this set-aside trial in HC' and he could have challenged it in second appeal !!!!
This citation has created a big business '1. ex-parte, 2. set-aside at trial court, 3. set-aside at HC; cycle.
It brought the husband back is at square one i.e. at step 1!!!!!
Good Judgement.....which has legitimised one more delaying tactic !!!