nalni (precticing lawyer) 20 October 2010

SEC 379 AND 411 OF IPC

PLS THE RESPECTED EXPERTS.GIVE UR OPINION ON THIS ISSUE.............

IS THERE HAVE ANY CASES IN WHICH ...AN ACCUSED IS ACCUITED IN the later case by consider the fact of prior case which was based on same fact in issue...........

an accused was involved in the case of u/s379.and 411of IPC prior he was accuited.later on he was again involved in another case but on same sec of ipc..........now the ld counsel of accuesd praying the court that as he was involved in the ame type of case.and accuited so the accused this time also.need to be accuited.......

IS THERE HAVE ANY JUDGEMENT WHERE THE COURT ACCUITED THE ACCUSED SECOND TIME ALSO BY CONSIDER THE FACT OF PRIOR CASE /FACE AND FINDING OF THE CASE.....

NEED HELP.......NALNI

Reply Follow

1 Replies

DEEPAK ASSOCIATES (08010117611) 23 October 2010

on which basis accused counsel praying the court that as he was involved in the ame type of case and deserve to be acquitted.

there must be some link between/amongst the case like where the theft had been committed was the same person or have some link with the another person.

Otherwise it create doubt upon accused that he is used to theft. Only Benefit of doubt can be given if prosecution fails to prove in evidence or evidence create two views.