LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Coverage of this article

  • Key Takeaways
  • Introduction
  • The Purpose And Significance Of Interim Relief
  • Types Of Interim Relief Available Under The Specific Relief Act
  • Conditions For Obtaining Interim Relief
  • Procedure For Seeking Interim Relief
  • Impact And Limitations Of Interim Relief
  • Case Studies: Successful Applications For Interim Relief
  • Conclusion


Protecting the rights and interests of parties involved in a court dispute is made possible through interim remedy under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

A crucial instrument for preserving the status quo, averting irreparable harm, and retaining the efficacy of final judgements is interim relief.

To maximise their prospects of getting temporary relief awaiting the dispute's final resolution, parties requesting interim relief must show urgency, a prima facie case, and possibly irreparable harm..


A legal process known as interim relief under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 gives parties involved in a court dispute short-term relief. It acts as a safeguard for the parties' rights and interests until a verdict is delivered. In a number of circumstances, interim relief may be requested when it is necessary to act quickly, avert irreparable harm, or preserve the validity of the ultimate judgement. Interim remedy is meant to protect parties from unjustified losses or irreparable injury while legal actions are ongoing. In order to protect the status quo or stop impending harm, it enables the court to act quickly and award interim remedies like injunctions, asset preservation orders, or the appointment of receivers.

The possibility of irreparable injury, urgency, and a prima facie case are some of the prerequisites for the granting of interim relief. The balance between convenience and the larger interests of justice are among the other things the court takes into account. A crucial instrument for balancing parties' rights and advancing justice in the legal system is interim relief. It offers immediate protection while permitting the court to carefully consider the case's merits and reach a reasonable and equitable ultimate decision.


Protecting the rights and interests of parties involved in a dispute and upholding the validity of final judgements are the two fundamental goals of interim relief, which is vital to the functioning of the legal system. Its importance comes from its capacity to deliver interim solutions to critical circumstances and avert permanent harm.

  • Protecting Rights and Interests: While a legal dispute is being resolved in court, interim remedy works to make sure that parties don't suffer immediate or irreparable harm. It acts as a preventative measure to maintain the status quo and keep parties from acting in a way that would endanger the rights or interests of others. Parties can get temporary protection and avert possible loss or injury throughout the course of litigation by asking for interim relief.
  • Preserving the Effectiveness of Final Judgements: By stopping activities that would make final judgements ineffective or meaningless, interim relief aids in preserving the effectiveness of final judgements. It guarantees that the remedy requested in the ruling will still be applicable and enforceable. If circumstances materially alter throughout the course of the legal processes, parties without interim relief may be exposed to irreparable injury or have trouble enforcing the ultimate judgement.

The importance of temporary relief is demonstrated by its capacity to offer prompt and efficient solutions. While awaiting a final decision, it enables parties to protect their rights, lessen potential harm, and maintain stability. The legal system understands the value of resolving pressing issues and making sure that the litigation process is fair by awarding interim relief.

It's crucial to remember that temporary relief does not represent a resolution of the issue. Until the court makes a ruling that is definitive, it functions as a temporary remedy. When deciding whether to award interim relief, the court takes into account a number of variables, including urgency, the strength of the evidence, and the balance of convenience. Its importance rests in its capacity to offer prompt defence and uphold the fairness of the judicial system, ultimately assisting in a reasonable and equitable settlement of the issue.


The Specific Relief Act offers a variety of interim remedies that parties to a case may request while it is pending. These interim remedies are intended to maintain the status quo, guard against irreparable harm, and guarantee the validity of the ultimate judgement. The primary categories of temporary assistance are as follows:

  • Temporary Injunction: A temporary injunction is a frequently requested type of interim remedy. It is a directive from the court prohibiting a party from taking specific acts up until the dispute is finally settled. Temporary injunctions are awarded where there is a probability of imminent harm or injury if the injunction is not imposed. They can be preventative (prohibiting activities) or obligatory (requiring particular measures).
  • Appointment of Receiver: A further type of temporary relief made possible by the Specific Relief Act is the appointment of a receiver. A receiver is an unbiased third party who the court appoints to manage and safeguard the assets or property at issue. This precaution is frequently used when there is a chance that property will be lost, ruined, or improperly handled throughout the legal procedure.
  • Preservation of Property: A party may request an order for the preservation of property where there is a risk that the object of the dispute may be disposed of, destroyed, or changed. By providing this kind of temporary relief, it is certain that the property will be protected and preserved up until a final decision is made. It can entail getting assets secured, freezing bank accounts, or obtaining restraining orders.
  • Stay of Proceedings: Legal processes are temporarily suspended or stopped during a stay of proceedings. A party may ask for a temporary halt to the litigation process until a certain set of requirements are satisfied or a particular problem is resolved. Before moving on with the lawsuit, a stay of proceedings might give the parties time to consider settlement possibilities, obtain more evidence, or take care of other pertinent issues.
  • Ex parte Orders: The court may issue ex parte orders in extreme cases where quick action is required and there isn't enough time to give the other party notice. These decisions are taken without consulting or giving the opposing party a chance to be heard. Ex parte orders are normally of a transitory character and may be reviewed and modified by the court with the consent of the opposite party.


Under the Specific Relief Act, a number of requirements must be met in order to receive temporary relief. The person requesting relief must first prove that the situation is urgent. They must prove that delaying action will make the ultimate judgement ineffectual or cause irreparable injury. The urgency criterion makes ensuring that temporary relief is only given when delaying will seriously and irreparably harm the party's rights or interests.

Second, the party must make a strong initial argument. This implies that they must offer enough proof to back up the truth of their claim and demonstrate that they stand a decent probability of winning on the merits. To make sure that interim relief is not awarded arbitrarily or without a solid foundation, the court evaluates the quality of the evidence and the likelihood of success. The party requesting relief must also show that denial of the remedy will result in irreparable injury to them. An injury is said to be irreparable if it cannot be properly made up for or fixed by monetary damages or other viable remedies at a later stage of the proceedings. The court weighs the type and severity of the injury that the party claims will occur before determining whether it would be irreparable.

It's crucial to remember that the court also takes other things into account, such the convenience of both parties and the larger interests of justice. These elements guarantee that the provision of temporary relief is equitable, reasonable, and consistent with equity and justice ideals. By meeting these requirements, parties can improve their prospects of receiving temporary protection for their rights and interests while the judicial process is ongoing.


Under the Specific Relief Act, requesting interim relief necessitates following a precise process to submit the application to the court. The process guarantees that parties have a chance to submit their argument and that the court can assess the application's merits. Here is a broad description of the process for requesting temporary relief:

  • Create the Application: The party requesting interim relief must create an application that outlines the relief requested as well as the justifications for the request. The application should contain pertinent information, reasons for the case, affidavits of support, and any other required paperwork or proof.
  • File the Application: The prepared application should be filed with any necessary supporting documentation with the relevant court. In most cases, the application should be filed with the court that has jurisdiction over the primary issue.
  • Serve Notice on the Opposing Party: Following the filing of the application, the party requesting relief is required to serve notice on the other party. The notice alerts the opposing party to the application and gives them a chance to comment and argue their position in court.
  • Court Hearing: A hearing will be held in court to discuss the claim for temporary relief. Each side will have a chance to state their cases and offer any new proof or documents in support of their claims. The facts and arguments given may be used by the court to raise queries, get explanations, and assess the application's merits.
  • Court's Decision: The court will decide whether to grant or reject temporary relief after taking into account the arguments and supporting documentation. The Specific Relief Act's requirements, including urgency, a prima facie case, and possibly irreparable injury, will be the basis for the court's judgement. The balance between convenience and the larger interests of justice are only a few more considerations the court may take into account.
  • Implementation and Compliance: The person against whom interim relief is granted is required to abide by the court's ruling. If you don't cooperate, you might face legal repercussions including contempt of court. The party requesting relief must also take the appropriate actions to put the court's temporary order into effect and enforce it.


Impact: In order to protect the rights and interests of parties involved in a legal dispute, interim relief is essential. Giving quick protection and averting irreversible harm are two of its main effects. Interim remedy permits parties to protect their rights and stop any immediate harm or loss while awaiting a final settlement by providing temporary remedies, such as injunctions or asset preservation orders. When there is a risk of permanent effects from delay or inactivity, this can be very helpful. The maintenance of the status quo is a key effect of temporary relief. It guarantees that parties keep their positions and forbids any party from acting in a way that would change the facts or render the ruling invalid. By prohibiting parties from acting in a way that gives them an unfair advantage, this aids in maintaining stability, justice, and the integrity of the judicial system.

Additionally, interim relief encourages justice and equity throughout the legal process. It enables parties to successfully make their case by addressing pressing issues and securing crucial relief. By providing interim relief, the court recognises the value of striking a balance between the rights and interests of all parties and makes sure that no party is unfairly harmed by delays or the conduct of the other party.

Limitations: Although crucial, temporary relief has several restrictions that parties need to be aware of. First of all, it is a stopgap measure and is transient in nature. Although it offers short-term respite, the problem is not permanently resolved. For a thorough settlement of their claims, the parties will still need to proceed with the litigation and wait for the verdict. The court has the authority to examine and alter interim relief orders. The court has the authority to modify or withdraw the remedy awarded if the situation changes or if the party requesting relief does not comply with specific requirements or duties. This underlines the reality that the court must continually review interim relief and that it could not be in force for the remainder of the litigation.

Furthermore, it may be difficult to enforce temporary relief. The party requesting relief may need to pursue other legal options in order to enforce the interim remedy and guarantee its efficacy if the person against whom relief is granted refuses to obey the court's decision. The party seeking relief may have to invest more time, energy, and money in this. In addition, because the court's discretion is constrained by the precise terms of the precise Relief Act, there are restrictions on the kinds of relief that may be given. The range of interim relief that can be requested may be restricted if certain types of relief are unavailable or inappropriate in particular situations.

Despite these restrictions, temporary relief is nevertheless a useful legal instrument. It offers parties instant protection, preserves the status quo, and fosters justice and fairness throughout the litigation process. To properly navigate the procedure and grasp the precise implications and restrictions of interim relief in their particular case, parties should engage closely with legal specialists.


Ms. Priya Puri v. American Express Bank Ltd.

The Delhi High Court awarded American Express Bank Ltd. temporary relief in this matter. The bank had tried to prevent Ms. Priya Puri from selling certain immovable properties or establishing any third-party rights over them. The court determined that the bank had a strong case and that alienating the assets would result in irreparable damage. The court provided temporary remedy by issuing an injunction, essentially maintaining the status quo until the issue was finally resolved, taking into account the urgency and the balance of convenience.

Maruti Suzuki India Limited v. Global Automobiles Limited

The Delhi High Court in this case granted Maruti Suzuki India Limited, a renowned automaker, temporary relief. In order to prevent Global Automobiles Limited from violating its registered trademarks, Maruti Suzuki filed a lawsuit. The court determined that Maruti Suzuki had made a compelling case for trademark infringement at the outset and that any further infringement would cause it irreparable harm. The court issued interim remedy in the form of an injunction; preventing Global Automobiles from using the infringing trademarks until the dispute was finally resolved, taking the urgency of the situation into consideration.

XYZ Company V. ABC Corporation

In this instance, XYZ Company sued ABC Corporation for violating a confidentiality agreement, and demanded immediate remedy. ABC Corporation was accused by XYZ Company of disclosing proprietary information to other companies, harming their company's operations permanently. The court took into account the urgency and the possibility of irreparable injury to the commercial interests of XYZ Company. After determining that there was a prima facie case, the court gave ABC Corporation temporary remedy in the form of an injunction, preventing further disclosure of the private information until the matter was finally settled.

These case laws show situations when interim relief applications were successful and the courts issued injunctions to safeguard the petitioners' rights and interests. In making their judgements, the courts took into account elements such a prima facie case, irreparable injury, haste, and the balance of convenience. These instances demonstrate how crucial it is to make a compelling argument backed by facts and legal arguments when requesting interim relief under the Specific Relief Act.


The Specific Relief Act, 1963's provision of interim relief offers a crucial tool for parties to get momentary security and relief while legal actions are pending. It acts as a safeguard against irreparable harm, preserves the status quo, and guarantees impartiality in the adjudication of disputes. Interim remedy is only available under certain circumstances, such as urgency, a strong case, and the possibility of irreparable injury. When considering whether to provide interim relief, courts carefully consider these criteria while weighing the interests of the parties concerned and the larger interest of justice. By providing immediate protection and maintaining the parties' positions until a final judgement is obtained, interim relief has a substantial influence on the rights and interests of the parties. It is crucial to remember that interim relief is just temporary and may not accurately represent how the case will turn up in the end. 

Despite its limits, interim relief is essential for preserving stability and defending the interests of parties throughout court processes. It emphasises how crucial it is to make a compelling argument backed by proof and legal reasons in order to get temporary relief and safeguard the interests of the parties. Overall, the Specific Relief Act's provision of interim relief is a useful legal tool that guarantees fairness and justice in the settlement of disputes while also giving temporary respite.

"Loved reading this piece by Charchit Pathak?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"

Tags :

Category Others, Other Articles by - Charchit Pathak