Redevelopment
tasneem kapasi
(Querist) 23 September 2017
This query is : Resolved
hello,
my father is a tenant of a non-residential (Commercial premises) in a building at Gamdevi which is under going for redevelopment. Do my father has a option of taking money from the developers and sell the said premises to the developer itself.
or, can my fahter demand residential premises in lieu of commercial premises from the developer in some other project of the same developer?
thanking you in anticiaption
Guest
(Expert) 24 September 2017
Not an ethical query.
Your father can listen to the voice of his own soul or may fulfill the wishes of the family, as he may prefer. Don't expect any unethical advice from experts.
Hemant Agarwal
(Expert) 24 September 2017
"tasneem kapasi" :
1. IT would be perfectly legal to negotiate with the Builder /Developer and Sell for Cash or demand Residential premises, in lieu of the existing property.
2. Further there is nothing "unethical, illegal or whatever", in doing the above.
Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
VISIT: http://www.maharashtra-society-help-forum.com
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 24 September 2017
Agree with the expert Hemant Agarwal.
Guest
(Expert) 24 September 2017
Agree with experts .....................
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 25 September 2017
@ "Tasneem Kapasi"
You will agree that a tenant shall always remain a "tenant" and s/he cannot enter into the shoes of landlord/owner to negotiate/bargain to outright sell out or create third party interest without consent/permission of owner irrespective of the fact that the demised property is commercial or residential and being redeveloped or not, there is something "conceptually" misunderstood and wrong interpretation.
Consult a local prudent lawyer for proper appreciation of facts and circumstances and guidance and proceeding in a professional manner.
Guest
(Expert) 25 September 2017
@Hemant Agarwal,
I could understand your personal perception, if practising in your personal or private life, but openly stating "nothing is unethical, illegal or whatever" on your part on an open forum is really surprising, at least for me.
In other words, by advising so, you seem to be not in favour of good mutual trustful relations between tenants and owners.
However, leave aside ethics, can you please clarify under which Act the demand or proposal of the father of the querist, as a tenant, to sell to the developer would be justified legally, when you believe nothing is illegal?
Otherwise, your slogan or advice, "keep smiling", may not hold good, as in the event of losing any faith and trust, a tenant can never be expected to keep smiling. It is only mutual trust between the owner and the tenant that makes relations happy and continuing. Once a tenant gets disputed other owners also remain cautioned from such type of tenants and would never like to give their premises on lease to them.
Hemant Agarwal
(Expert) 25 September 2017
JIGYASU: Legal Analyst (Expert)
1. Though my reply was NOT addressed to you, you can Keep getting "really surprising". It ain't worth a dime, to see your "really surprising". You may be a "learner", .BUT. I do not wish to teach or clarify to you or anybody about any Law or Strategies, as you desired to, more so in an "open forum" like this one.
2. It ain't worth a dime, to see "good mutual trustful relations" .AND. I dont bother about so called "good mutual trustful relations", since there is non-such thing .AND. further such "good mutual trustful relations" are usually hallucinations & one-sided practiced by "escapists & philosophers".
3. At your ripe-age, you could prefer to refrain from third-party arguments /philosopher'giri or imposing your views on others. It is a sign of Dementia (non-curable). Singing "bhajans" with your ghetto-group, might provide some respite.
4. FURTHER, it seems that you have obvious problems with "smiling", at your ripe-age, apprehensively since the facial muscles might be constrictingly difficult to SMILE.
Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
Guest
(Expert) 25 September 2017
Seems to be a good lesson for Mr. Jigyasu from the side of Mr. Hemant Agarwal.
But I don't think there was anything wrong on the part of Mr. Jigyasu in pinpointing that such advice would have been better had that been given to the clients privately, but not openly, if Mr. Hemant Agarwal did not think anything unethical or illegal.
If Mr. Hemant Agarwal may not mind, frankly speaking, in my opinion, his advice, if adhered to can only become a cause for a long term dispute among the owner, tenant and the developer.
Of course, one good thing has become noticeable on the part of Mr. Hemant Agarwal that he has advised Mr. Jigyasu to "keep smiling" even after getting rebuked by him, like anything.
So, Mr. Jigyasu should start smiling, even when he has been rebuked by Mr. Hemant Agarwal after disliking his analysis on the advice of Mr. Hemant Agarwal to the querist.
Guest
(Expert) 25 September 2017
Wow, I really get a smile on the funny reaction of Mr. Hemant Agarwal on my simple query under which the action of selling of a property by a tenant (not an owner) can be legal. Never mind, if he does not want to share his secret for the purpose of my learning on how an illegal practice can be treated as legal.
I don't mind, if he thinks an illegal transaction as legal. But that surely demonstrates the nature of his legal practice, as a professional.
Guest
(Expert) 25 September 2017
Mr. Jigyasu,
But question arises, why do you worry, if a professional does not believe in ethical legal practice? You should mind your own business.
Guest
(Expert) 25 September 2017
Mr. Dhingra,
You seem to be mistaken, if you say that my business. At least at LCI, it is not my business, but a hobby to legally analyse most of the pieces of vague and misleading advice rendered by experts, as I noticed, some self styled experts even with fake identity often come forward with plenty of their vague and misleading posts, which do not have any legal value, but still claim themselves as legal experts.
Anyway, I expressed my opinion, let anyone mind as per his mindset. However, he can feel free to prove me wrong, if legally he can.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 25 September 2017
Well commented by the expert Hemant Agarwal.
Any expert ought to contribute and advice if have knowledge, rather to post vague in the name of analyst.
This is not a place for hobby.
Guest
(Expert) 25 September 2017
Mr. Rajendra K Goyal,
Earlier, you agreed with the advice of Mr. Hemant Agarwal, which means you also agree that "nothing is unethical or illegal" in your legal practice, even if a tenant sells the property of his landlord or flat owner, as Mr. Heman Agarwal admitted.
Is that correct, as you have already agreed on Mr. Hemant Agarwal's advice?
Further, if it is not a place to anlyse advice of experts as a matter of hobby, it is definitely not a place to render wrong and misleading advice to the querists. Further, there is no ban on analysing the advice of experts and to point out if wrong or misleading, may be as a profession, business or hobby.
If Mr. Hemant Agarwal or you are correct in saying that it is not illegal if a tenant sells the property of his landlord/ flat owner or puts an illicit demand from the developer outside the knowledge of the flat owner, why he is afraid of justifying his statement as per the law of the land, if questioned.
IF Mr. AGARWAL'S OR YOUR OWN TENANT SELLS HOUSE BELONG TO ANY OF YOU, WOULD YOU TREAT THAT AS LEGAL ACTIVITY ON THE PART OF YOUR TENANT?
Here Mr. Agarwal has advertised his website, http://www.maharashtra-society-help-forum.com, just to lure customers. The registrant is Mr. Hemant Agarwal, himself, and the registrant contacts contacts are as follows:
Name:Hemant Agarwal, Street:K-404, Nalanda Sunder Nagar,Malad (W), City:Mumbai, Postal Code:400064, Country:IN.
Is that allowed as per the Advocate's Act?
ALSO, CAN HE DENY that the aforesaid website does not belong to him?
In fact some experts adopt unethical practice openly, but when asked to justify that legally, instead of justifying their stand, they start abusing, as Mr. Agarwal did in this thread, and even then without any feeling of shame advises "keep smiling.".
Guest
(Expert) 25 September 2017
What I feel, Mr. Hemant Agarwal and Mr. Rajndra K Goyal seem to have forgotten the saying, "those who live in glass house should not throw stones on others."
Now, I could understand, why Mr. fraud Doab used to recommend the names of Mr. Hemant Agarwal and Rajendra K Goya to the querists, in whatever capacity that be. If they don't mind, their integrity and individual image seem to have been influenced much by the association of fraud Doab.
Mr. Jigyasu seems to know much more than most of the us and probably does not live in any glass house.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 26 September 2017
Mr. Hemant Agarwal has provided you with concise and precise advise.
Mr. Hemant Agarwal is well versed with such matters and has enriching the forum with his contributions.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 26 September 2017
You will note that 3rd post from top and just above the post of Mr. Hemant Agarwal is from one of the multiple fake ID’s of and IT=@PSD from all of IT’s fake ID’s and IT’s puppets ( Chamcha’s) have been posting fully wrong advices for querists for years, despite FREE tutorials for years at LCI…………..
The long drawn and multiple posts by one fake ID to other is post Salutes to same poser and impostor IT=@PSD.....
Guest
(Expert) 26 September 2017
Is Kumar Doab a real expert or a lawyer, when his name is fake, his face is invisible, even his location is not mentioned in his profile at LCI?
So, as I already state, as a tout or associate, Mr. Kumar Doab, a fraud, fake expert and suspected terrorist has ultimately recommended the name of Mr. Hemant Agarwal!
(Expert) 24 September 2017
