DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF COMPLAINANT
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 16 December 2010
This query is : Resolved
C; the Complainant RV: an advocate KMS: Jr. to RV P: Govt employee B: Govt employee
The complainant in his complaint says "RV informed him that P and B are demanding money to do his work. Then C alongwith RV went nd met them ona date. P and B demanded money failing which the work will bedelayed."
The date which he is mentioning is totally false. no one met him on that date neither earlier nor later.No money was demanded from RV by both govt employees. here the complainan fails to mention the date on which RV told him. The date on which he alleges to have met the place and who arraned for thi meeting etc..
In his stttment given later on he states that "the date on which he met the govt employees the ovt employees discussed someting in their mother tongue with RV andf RV informed him that they are demanding . the language in which they discussed which he did not understand"
after two days RV takes KM and P to the complainant place and introduces them to C. Pl note that voice transcription memo shows that introduction takes place on this day. so it is proved that earlier C did not meet anyone. In this meeting KM intorduces himself as govt employee. later on KM accepts the money. RV under fear says this money is mean for B and P. thereafter he contacts B. KM hands over the tainted poart in the hands iof B. since B is Partially blind and cannot see with left eye KM utilises this point and hands over thru left part. upon handing over B was caught . The B then hands over the same to P by saying it is ur money and I dont know how much it is.
Now chargesheet is filed . Earlier B, P and KM were arrested/ Nmae of B was not in the FIR. In the fir they have stated that prima facie offence on behalf of KM and P is registred. Now the position is B, P, KM and RV all are chargesheeted. Now what will happen in the trial court and How B can protect himself. B hss neiher demanded from C,KM,P or RV
1. WHETHERTHE COMPLAINANT CAN MAKE DIFFERENT STATEMENTS ONE ON HIS COMPLAINT AND THE OTHER ON HIS STATEMENT
A. WE DEMANDED MONEY B. HIS ADVOCATE INFORMED HIM ABOUT THE DEMAND
2.THEPLACE AND DATE ON WHICH HE ALLEGED TO HAVE MET WITH HIS COUNSEL NEVER TOOK PLACE. THE MOBILE LOCATION OF RV AND THE COMPLAIANT WILL PROVE
3. CCTV RECORDINGS IN OUR OFFICE WILL PROVE
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 16 December 2010
1. In case complainant has made different versions on different occasions in a similar case, he shall have to face its consequences and its entire benefit shall go in favour of the accused.
2. If it happens then also it shall become fatal for the case.
3. It is good for your case.
