LIVE Online Course on Indian Constitution by Dr. Ravishankar Mor. Register Now!!
The Indian Constitution Courses

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Hospital claims doc not on rolls

profile picture Selvam P    Posted on 21 December 2008,  
  Share  Bookmark

Hospital claims doc not on rolls

16 May 2008, 0302 hrs IST, Deeksha Chopra, TNN

NEW DELHI: The state consumer commission has ruled that the hospital, not the doctor, will be liable to compensate a patient in case of a botched-up surgery or any other kind of medical negligence.

Delivering the judgment, Justice J D Kapoor said: "Whenever a patient lands in any hospital, nursing home or medical centre, he is directly availing the services of the said hospital...and not the treating doctor. Hence, if the patient suffers due to medical negligence or carelessness of the doctor, the liability will fall on the hospital."

The complaint filed by a patient, Mohammed Azmal, claimed that he was admitted to the hospital in 1996 because of stomach pain. He was diagnosed with gallstones and told by the doctors that the gall bladder was to be removed through laparoscopy. Azmal agreed to undergo the procedure for a package deal of Rs 37,500.

But the doctor botched the keyhole surgery. An endoscopy report after the operation revealed a duct that was not sealed properly and resulted in accumulation of fluid in the stomach. Three more operations had to be performed on the patient whose condition had become critical. This raised the bill to almost Rs 1.6 lakh. In its defence, the hospital pleaded that the consulting doctor was not an employee of the hospital and the hospital was not responsible for any alleged negligence or deficiency in service in diagnosing and giving treatment on the part of the consultant doctor. It also pleaded the ailment required close investigation and detailed enquiry, hence there was no question of a package scheme.

The hospital added the complainant was told that his gall bladder was inflamed due to a stone and therefore the lap chole method (laparascopic removal of the gall bladder) may not be feasible and conventional surgery would have to be done.

Quashing this plea, Justice J D Kapoor asked that had lap chole not been feasible, why was the patient subjected to this method?


"Loved reading this piece by Selvam P?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"

Tags :

  Views  244  Report

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query