CASE TITLESUMEDH SINGH SAINI VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.KEY TAKEAWAYSThe current Chief Minister of Punjab was also the CM of the state when the petitioner was exposing the corrupt officials. There was just a political vendetta against the petitioner. ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM NAME: Sau. Sangeeta w/o Sunil Shinde v. The State of Maharashtra and others CORAM: Justices L Nageswara Rao and BR GavaiKEY TAKEAWAYS INCPS was created and a Gatneta (group leader) was appointed by the petitioner which was ..
KEY TAKEAWAYSThe SC in State of Madhya Pradesh vs Akhilesh Jha held that delay in conducting an inquiry does not vitiate it or make it void. It must be shown that prejudice has been caused on the basis of all the circumstances of the case. Prejudice ..
CJI Stresses Need For National Judicial Infrastructure Corporation The Chief Justice of India, N V Ramana, announced that a comprehensive proposal for the establishment of the National Judicial Infrastructure Corporation (NJIC) is under preparation. ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case: Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. Union of India Coram: Justice L. Nageswara Rao and B.R. Gavai Case No: WP(C) 1374 of 2020KEY-TAKEAWAYS The Supreme Court granted approval to the term of Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra. ..
Background of the Case The case title is "Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd (CA 5627 of 2021)". The appeal was heard by the Supreme Court on 9th September 2021. The Supreme Court Bench that heard the ..
CASE TITLESadique vs. State of Madhya Pradesh; CrA 963 OF 2021KEY TAKEAWAYS This case was heard by the bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, and Belam M Trivedi. The counsels for this case were Sr. Adv Siddhartha Dave for the accused, ..
Name of the CaseK.N. Nagarajappa v. H. Narasimha ReddyKey Takeaways A High Court’s judgment allowing second appeal was challenged on the ground of it being out of jurisdiction of the Court. The Supreme Court observed that when the lower Court w ..
In A Democratic Setup, The Will Of The Majority Has To PrevailThe case was of Sangeeta w/o Sunil Shinde v. The State of Maharasthra&Ors.The decision was given by Justice L Naheswara Rao and Justice B R Gavai. The appeal was dismissed and the High ..
Background The petitioners had filed a claim against the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA). According to the petition, various insurance companies had collected premium amounts from a large number of Indian citizens, and there wer ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
