Case titleDr Prateek Rastogi & Ors v National Board of Examination and OrsKey Takeaways This case was heard by Justices DY Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna. The learned counsel of the petitioner was Senior Advocate Shyam Divan. Only the Central Gove ..
Key Takeaways Accused convicted under Section 326 of IPC for causing grievous hurt. Supreme Court said that when giving punishment, the aggravating and mitigating factors of the crime have to be considered. Court cannot ignore brutality even if compr ..
Name of the CaseSalim D. Agboatwala and Ors. v. Shamalji Oddavji Thakkar and Ors.Key Takeaways The petitioners had approached the Court challenging the decision of Agricultural Land Tribunal granting sale certificate. The Court observed that the genu ..
Case titleJaganarayan Lal Vs Doctor Girija TiwariKey Takeaways This case was heard by the Bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian Just because the appellant is the Karta of Joint HinduFamily and the brother-in-law of the pregnant woman, ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name: Ashish Vinod Dalal & Ors vs Vinod Ramanlal Dalal & Ors Coram: G.S. KULKARNI, J.KEY TAKEAWAYS Section 4 explicitly says that it is the children's or relatives' responsibility to meet the requiremen ..
Compromise Between Accused & Victim Cannot Be The Solitary Basis For Reduction Of SentenceThe case was of Bhagwan Narayan Gaikwad v. State Of Maharashtra. The decision was given by Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka. The bench noted that othe ..
Facts of the Case Ritesh Sinha and Dhoom Singh allegedly hatched a scam to collect money from innocent people promising them recruitment in the police department. Dhoom Singh was arrested, and a mobile seized from him. A recorded conversation between ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS The Supreme Court in a recent case said that an employee who made false or suppressed evidence in a criminal case will not be entitled to continue in service as a matter of right. This judgement set aside the verdict of Rajasthan High C ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name: Alkesh and others Vs. State of M.P. Case Citation: Criminal Appeal No.8182/2019 Coram:Justice Subodh AbhyankarKEY TAKEAWAYS Despite the fact that the FIR is not an encyclopaedia of the events or facts, it is crit ..
Facts of the case The current case was directed against an order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in 2006. The plaintiff in the case was inducted as a tenantby the Rent Controller under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961. ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
