Key Takeaways High Court refused to entertain a writ petition since an alternate remedy was available and because the dispute involved a question of fact which was not amenable in the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. The case went to the Supreme ..
KEY TAKEWAYS The exclusion of any caste other than Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe from purview of Census is a conscious policy decision taken by Central Government Sharing of census data of OBCs collected by Centre upon direction from Court to ..
Case titleNational Highway Authority of India vs Madhukar KumarKey Takeaways This case was heard by the bench of Justice KM Joseph and Justice S Ravindra Bhat. According to the Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) R ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name: Gaurav Kumar Bansal v Union of India Coram: Justices MR Shah and AS BopannaKEY TAKEAWAYS Issue of compensation to the family of the deceased person due to COVID dealt with. Payments to be made to Next of the Kin. ..
Key Takeaways Under Section 18(A) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 a court may pass an order to conduct the trial of a child as an adult. This decision is to be taken after conducting a preliminary assessment under section 15 of the Act. The questio ..
Key Takeaways Res Judicata to be applicable only in case of conclusive judgments given by the courts. A suit under Section 92 shall be considered as a representative suit and therefore, shall be binding on all the parties interested in the issue.Fact ..
SC Upholds Rejection Of Candidature To Judicial Post Citing Absence Of Honourable Acquittal In Criminal CaseIt was observed by the court that a common man's perception about credentials of judicial officer is vital and the lack of honourable acqu ..
Case titleDLF Home Developers Limited vs. Rajapura Homes Private LimitedKey Takeaways The case was heard by the bench of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant. Two separate arbitration petitions were filed in this case by the petiti ..
Section 92 CPC- Judgment In Representative Suit Binds All Parties Interested In The Trust: SCThe case was of Jamia Masjid v. K V Rudrappa. The decision was given by Justices DY Chandrachud, Vikram Nath and Hima Kohli. It has been held by the Court th ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name Siddaraju v. the State of Karnataka, Case Number: MA No.2171/2020 in CA No.1567/2017 Coram: Justice Nageswara Rao, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice B.R. GavaiKEY TAKEAWAYS People with disabilities are eligible for p ..