The appellants are engaged in the trading of High Technology reproduction and Duplicating machines, printers and Multi-Functional Machines capable of discharging number of functions. During the period March, September and November, 1999, the appellan..
Redemption of the mortgaged property - Main issue in the instant case was till which stage the right of redemption can be exercised over the mortgaged property - whether the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, including Sections 60 and 69, wi..
Status quo qua possession of the suit property till the disposal of the suit- an application of ad-interim injunction during the pendency of the appeal.- whether suit decreed by the learned Trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 09.06.2010 after ..
Non-filing of the written statement within stipulated period of time- applicability of provision of Order 8 Rule 1 Civil Procedure Code- Whether Defendant-petitioner can file written statement before the learned Trial Court? ..
Fraudulent bank transactions-Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in deciding the matter in favour of the Respondents? ..
Depreciation- Applicability of Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961- Whether Tribunal erred in allowing the depreciation on BSE Membership card to the Assessee ..
Litigant has right to seek transfer of case: Bombay HC , i need this judgements can you give any one ..
The question that falls for consideration in these appeals is whether a manufacturer of a specified final product falling under the schedule of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (in short “the Tariff Act”) is eligible to get the benefit of exemptio..
All these appeals are directed against the judgment dated 19th February, 2009, passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court dismissing the several petitions filed by the Appellants under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197..
An area of 4.89 acres of land (which includes 54 cents in Survey No. 186/1 and 1.09 acres of land in Survey No. 186/2, in all 1.63 acres, which is the subject matter of this appeal) in Koyambedu Village, Chennai District was notified for acquisition ..
The appellant herein was the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent seeking for a decree for possession and future mesne profits with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and for payment of Rs.4,500/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum ..
This public interest litigation petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing Respondent No.1, Respondent Nos.2 to 13 and Respondent Nos.27 to 44 to put in a place a transparent and fair pr..
Dematerialization request-Application of Regulation 54(5) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996 -Whether the Adjudicating Officer was justified in imposing penalty on the Appellant company? ..
Calculation of offer price in indirect acquisition-Application of The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997- Whether the Securities and Exchange Board of India was justified in cons..
Acquisition of shares-Board directed the Appellants to work out the offer price of the shares with reference to three dates namely, November 30, 2009, May 29, 2010 and June 7, 2010- whether or not the Board erred in directing the Appellants to recalc..
Refusal of the information without giving any exemption under Section 8(1) of the Right to Information Act 2005- Whether PIO had any reasonable cause to offer for refusing to obey the directions of the Commission for providing the information. ..
Member Strength 9,47,890 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
