In the present case, the petitioner was undergoing treatment and needed a donor to transplant his kidney. A close friend of his was ready to donate. Therefore, they applied to the Authorization Committee for granting the permission. However, the conc..
A dispute arose between the two partners of a partnership firm named Calla Associates. The main allegations of the Appellant are that the First Respondent had forged relevant documents and had misappropriated the amount invested by him. The Responden..
In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the order of the High Court for demolition of the 40 story twin tower because of illegal construction...
..
In this matter, the accused challenged his conviction by the trial court under Section 374(2) of the CrPC upon the main ground that he had no prior intention to kill or cause any hurt or injury to his wife...
In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the judgement of the lower court and asserted that for conviction under Section 34, it is not essential to show the physical activity of assault. The existence of mens rea in furtherance of a common intention is..
..
..
In this case, the plaintiff challenged the order of the commercial court that denied them leave to amend/enhance the claim in the plaint and also barred them from producing new documents to support their contentions...
The following is a bank fraud case, which enshrines that bail must not be granted mechanically in such cases, but upon the facts and circumstances and the magnitude of the offence...
In the instant case, the High Court allowed an appeal filed by the claimant and directed that he would be supplied with good quality and lifetime warranty-based prosthetic limb. It was further directed that the insurance company would bear the cost o..
In the present case, the petitioner and the respondents were husband and wife. The respondent had lodged an FIR against the petitioner u/s 498-A and 34 of IPC. Further, the parties have amicably settled their disputes and taken divorce. Thereafter, t..
In the present case, the applicant and the opposite parties were husband and wife. The opposite party filed a complaint against the applicant under section 498-A of IPC. During the pendency of the case, the parties settled their matter amicably. The ..
..
The following Judgement deals with the interpretation of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, delving into the question of whether a person below the rank of Inspector can assist the main Investigating Officer in conducting an invest..
In this case, Justice N.K. Johari quashed the FIR and set aside the criminal proceedings against the accused after the matter was settled by the parties, thereby establishing that inherent power of the High Court is not limited by Section 320 of the ..
In the present case, the petitioner approached the Apex Court challenging the notification issued by the State Gov. of Haryana on August 17th, 2016, and August 28th, 2018 sub-classifying backward classes solely on an economic basis while fixing the c..
In this case, the respondent, in discharge of his liability, issued two cheques which were dishonoured under Section 138 of the NI Act. Both the parties expressed the intention to amicably settle their disputes and the matter was referred to mediatio..
In the present case as per the mediation settlement, the petitioner failed to pay the settled amount. In case of any post-dated cheque that has been dishonoured, the settlement would become null and void. Thereby, the complainant’s case continued as ..
The petitioner filed two writ petitions before the Allahabad High Court challenging the Circular dated 26th October 2020. According to it, a member of the disciplined force is not allowed to maintain a beard, however, the petitioner had violated the ..