This is an appeal for setting aside order dated 3.8.2007 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, "the National Commission") whereby the revision preferred by the appellant against the order passed by the State Consumer Disp..
This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 16.12.2005 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 73843 of 2005 of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court...
This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 29.10.2004 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Contempt Petition No. 397 of 2001 whereby the High Court held the respondents therein guilty of the o..
This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.5.2004 passed by learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court in Civil revision No. 945 of 2002...
The perennial question whether accused deserve to be convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter shall be referred as 'I.P.C.') as held by the trial court and upheld by the High Court or whether the conviction should be converte..
This appeal, under Section 116A of the Representation of People Act, 1951, is directed against judgment dated December 2, 2008, rendered by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Election Petition No. 2 of 2006 by which..
Appellant as Complainant filed a criminal complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida (U.P.) on 23.7.2004, under Sections 138 and 141 of the Act. It was alleged in the said complaint that cheques bearing nos.382874 and 38..
Section 16(3) as amended, does not impose any restriction on the property right of such children except limiting it to the property of their parents. Therefore, such children will have a right to whatever becomes the property of their parents whether..
selection and appointment of all the other 83 respondents are set aside for having indulged in malpractices and for grossly violating the instructions to the candidates..
selection and appointment of all the other 83 respondents are set aside for having indulged in malpractices and for grossly violating the instructions to the candidates..
..
The facts have been stated in detail in the impugned order and hence we are not repeating the same here except where necessary. ..
The plaintiff-appellant had filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,31,000/-. He claimed that the defendant had executed a pronote and receipt dated 2.5.1994 whereby the defendant had borrowed a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- from the plaintiff and agreed to repay t..
The facts of the case have been stated in the impugned judgment of the High Court and the trial court and we are not repeating the same except where necessary...
On 12th December, 2009, the Government of Madhya Pradesh in the Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, hereinafter referred to as "FCS", issued a Request for Proposal, hereinafter referred to as "RFP", for the appointment of a ve..
All the accused-appellants stood convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kollam by its judgment dated 16.7.2002 for various offences punishable under Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326, 328 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as also under..
The controversy in this appeal, by special leave, is concerned with will dated May 21, 1920 executed by Bijivemula Subba Reddy resident of Chennavaran, village Kattera Gandla, Badwel Taluq, Cuddapah District. The question is one of construction upon ..
Appeal allowed. Impugned judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the Patna High Court in Writ Petition bearing No.CWJC 9981/2010 dated 8th July, 2010 is set aside. The said writ petition filed by the appellant herein stands allowed in part..
The grievance of the appellant before the High Court was that he was wrongly not appointed as an Art and Craft teacher. It was the case of the appellant that certain candidates belonging to backward class `A' category had been given appointment again..