Mr. Saurabh Bharadwaj,
You cannot use a word ‘corrupt Advocate’ without any evidence or assuming Mr.Dash’s words, how can you predict that Mr.Dash is telling truth or how can you say that Mr.Dash’s advocate is corrupt. One thing I undersatnd that here is purly 'MONEY' matter. Don’t forget that Mr.Dash also an advocate. He would also be charging for his advise and you would also raise invoice for your consultation, nobody would do any charity task to others. Even you also won’t do free consultation for others.
Mr.Saurah, you also understand the law before placing any judgment, judgments can differs from subject to subject and by posting one SC citation you cannot decide that advocate is corrupt or Mr.Dash is genuine or innocent person.
Tell us, what will you do if one of your client taped your conversation without your knowledge/permision and sharing it in this forum? (for any reason).
One more suggestion is that If you carefully see this issue from begging you would come to know real picture. Whereas in 2nd page I ‘gently given my feed back to Mr.Dash, summarily Mr.Dash changed his stance, that why how can I trust this person.
Rgds
Basavaraj.r