Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ABDUL RUB.E. (SELF EMPLYED)     02 August 2009

USED RTI ACT AGAINST CORRUPTION

RECENTLY I MADE A MOVE AGAINST A SERIOUS VIOLATION OF PANCHAYATHEE RAJ ACT BY THE ON GOING LSGD INSTITUTIONS IN KERALA STATE. THE AUTHORITY WAS KERALA PANCHAYATH OMBUDSMAN WHICH IS SINGLE BENCH BODY. THE OMPLAINT WAS LIKE THIS - AS PER THE PANCHAYATHEE RAJ ACT, EACH AND EVERY RULING BODIES OF LSGD INSTITUTIONS, WHO WERE ELECTCTED NEWLY MUST PUBLISH THE CITIZEN CHART WITH IN THE PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS WHICH IS A MANDATORY PROVISION (272-A), IN THE ABOVE ACT. AND IF THESE BODIES NEVER DO THIS WITHIN THE PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS, AS PER THE PANCHAYATHEE RAJ ACT, SECTION 193 THE BODIES MUST BE DISSOLVED BY THE PANCHAYATH OMBUDSMAN. i FILED THE COMPLAINT AGAINST MY OWN PANCHAYATH WITH THE OMBUDSMAN. WITH THE COMPLAINT I SUBMITTED ALL THE RELAVANT EVIDENCES WHICH WAS PROVIDED BY THE DIRETOR OF PANHAYATHS OF KERALA AND MY PANCHAYATH. BUT EVEN WITH THIS PRESENCE OF FOOL PROOF EVIDENCES THE OMBUDSMAN DELIBERATELY MANIPULATED THE COMPLAINT AND DENIED ME JUSTICE. BECAUSE THIS OMBUDSMAN WAS THE NOMINEE OF RUNNING STATE GOVT. AND 90% OF THE PANHAYATH IS RUNNING BY THE RULING FRONT OF KERALA. SO IF HE MADE A GENUINE VERDICT AS PER THE LAW, MOST OF THE PANCHAYATHS WILL LOSS THE POWER OF STATE RULING FRONT AS PER THE URRENT POLITICAL SITUATION. THEN I SEEK INFORMATION FROM THE STATE LSGD DEPARTMENT WHETHER THE WHOLE LSGD INSTITUTIONS WERE PUBLISHED THE CITIZEN CHARTER WITH IN THE PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS AFTER THEY SWORN IN. THE VERY FIRST THE DIRECTORATE PIO TRY DO DENY THE INFORMATION. BUT AFTER APPEAL I HAVE RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM 90% LSGD INSTITUTIONS WERE VIOLATED SECTION 272-A OF PANCHAYAHTEE RAJ ACT BY WITHOUT PUBLISHING THE CITIZEN CHART IN MEAN TIME. I REFERRED ALL THE IN FORMATION TO A EMEINENT JOURNALIST IN TRIVANDRUM. AFTER GETTING MY DOCUMENTS HE ALSO TAKE INFORMATION RELATED THIS MATTER FROM LEGISLATIVE SECRETARIAT AND AS PER HIS REQUEST ONE OPPOSITE MLA ASKED QUESTION ABOUT THE MATTER. THE LSGD MINISTER INFORM THE ASSEMBLY THAT SECTION 272-A MUST BE IMPLEMENT BY THE NEWLY ELECTED BODIES OF PANCHAYATH WITH IN 6 MONTHS AND ALL THE LSGD INSTITUTIONS ARE DONE THIS IN THE STATE. AS PER THE RTI INFORMATION GIVEN BY THE LSGD INSTITUTIONS ALLOVER KERALA IS PROVE THAT THE STATEMENT OF MINISTER WAS FALSE AND BY THIS STATEMENT HE DISGUISED THE ASSEMBLY. SO IT IS VIOLATION OF RULE BY THE MINISTER TOO. I MADE THE COMPLAINT AGAIN TO THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF LSGD. BUT HIS OFFICE NEVER READY TO CONSIDER MY COMPLAINT. SO AGAIN I ASKED THE POSITION OF MY COMPLAINT AND ACTION TAKEN REPORT ON MY COMPLAINT THROUGH RTI ACT. THEN HEREPLIED THAT THERE WAS NO ANY EVIDENCES SUBMITTED WITH THE COMPLAINT. THEN I SEND 22 LETERS FROM THE CONCERNED LSGD INSTITUTIONS WHO WERE NOT PUBLISHED THE CITIZEN CHARTER IN MEAN TIME. I M WAITING FOR THE RESULT OF THAT. I HAVE SEND A COMPLAINT TO KERALA HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE SOCIETY AND SEND AN EMAIL COMPLAINT TO SECRETARY OF SUPREME COURT AND TO THE CENTRAL MINISTRY OF PANCHAYATHEE RAJ. THE KERALA HIGH COURT REPLY ME AFTER TWO MONTHS THAT MY PETIONS IS NOT A INDIVIDUAL GRIEVANCE SO THEY CAN NOT PROCESS ON IT. AS I AM A FINANCIALLY WEAK PERSON I CAN NOT APPROACH THE HIGHCOURT DIRECTLY. THAT'S WHY I SUBMITTED THIS TO THE SOCIETY. THERE WAS NO ANY REPLY FROM SECRETARY OF SUPREME COURT. SO I M SEEKING A SOLUTION FOR MY PROBLEM TO GET JUSTICE. HERE THE UN HEALTHY RELATION OF OMBUDSMAN AND THE RULING POLITICAL FRONT IS REVILED. AND I COMPLIANT BY ONLINE TO THE PUBLIC GRIEVANCE CELL OF CENTRAL GOVT. THE INFORM ME THAT THEY REFERRED THE COMPLAINT TO THE KERALA STATE CHIEF MINISTER'S PUBLIC GRIEVANCE CELL. BUT TILL 2 MONTHS THERE IS NO ANY REPLY FROM THEM.



Learning

 1 Replies

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     31 August 2009

 Paper pushers.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register