Dear Experts,
I am confused with the RTI Section 6(3) rule. I sent one RTI application for seeking some information to PIO , O/o Municipal Commissioner, on 1st September 2025 . I have not recieved any reply from the PIO even after 30 days, so after 40 days (i.e) on 10th October 2025 I sent First Appeal to the First Appellate Authority, O/o The Municipal Commissioner and now after 50 days (i.e) on 20th october 2025, The PIO, O/o Municipal Commissioner forwarded to his sub ordinate officer (i.e) PIO, O/o The Superintending Engineer and now even after 30 days till today also the deemed PIO, O/o The Superintending Engineer did not reply.
As per my knowledge, I noticed these voilations :
1) The PIO, O/o The Municipal Commissioner did not transfer my RTI application to the deemed PIO, O/o The Superintending Engineer within 5 days by voilating RTI section 6(3) but transfered my application to the deemed PIO after 50 days (i.e) after filing my First Appeal to the same Municipal Commissioner office.
2) The Deemed PIO, O/o The Superintending Engineer did not reply or provided any information even after 30 days till today by voilating RTI section 6(1).
My Query is as follows :
Now i wan't to file complaint to Information Commissioner, So against whom I should give complaint either PIO, Municipal Commissioner or Deemed PIO, O/o Superintending Engineer ? Since both have voilated RTI Act, The PIO, Municipal Commissioner dId not transfer my RTI application in time (i.e) within 5 days but after 40 days after filing my First Appeal transferred to deemed PIO and the deemed PIO, O/o Superintending Engineer did not provided information even after 30 days till today .
Thanks,
Narayana Swamy.
