Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Thakur Khoob Chand Bojwani   26 September 2020

regarding sec 138 cheque bounce

Demand legal notice:
Reference Number - Mum/idfc/0000/00/00under section 138c filed against you for total amount recovery of your loan -and was accepted in Mumbai Metropolitan court on 21th Sep 2020,at chamber 512. We hereby request you to URGENTLY clear your pending emi urgently to avoid issuance of Non-Bailable Warrants under section 138c.
Per 1 hering 3000
Will be saport u

Am xyz advocate name
Section ,428,512

Cheeting case filed. attend
At your local court chambar

sir my doubt is sec 428 of killing of an animal whose Value is above 10 ruppes
and how can it be cheating case sections

sir what can defaulter do. in the above case as he says what happens when he'll pay the total amount.


Quick Summary
This discussion revolves around a legal notice issued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a bounced cheque. The notice, filed in Mumbai, warns of non-bailable warrants if pending EMIs are not cleared urgently. A user also raises confusion about Section 428 being cited alongside the cheque bounce, questioning its relevance to a cheating case. The advice given suggests seeking guidance from a local senior advocate due to the vague and confused legal propositions presented.

 4 Replies

Kadori. Aadiwasi Kadore. Aadiw   27 September 2020

kadoreAadiwasi

Dr J C Vashista (Advocate)     27 September 2020

Vague facts and confused legal preposition.

Seek guidance of a local senior.

G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.)     27 September 2020

Other facts and Contents are material important and not the typographical error.  Such submissions can be made in Court.

P. Venu (Advocate)     27 September 2020

Yes, the facts posted are vague and confused.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register