Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Preetam Banerjee   16 April 2026

Quashing ipc 306

Quashing petition under IPC 306 filed in High Court (family dispute, not matrimonial). Parties filed compromise. Court directed State to produce Case Diary (CD). State opposed quashing citing Supreme Court rulings but failed to submit CD. Court insists on perusing CD before final order. Query: Does this indicate a positive inclination toward quashing or merely a procedural step?


Quick Summary
This discussion concerns a petition filed in the High Court to quash an IPC 306 charge, stemming from a family dispute. Although the parties have reached a compromise, the court is awaiting the Case Diary from the State before making a decision. The State opposed the quashing, citing Supreme Court precedents, but failed to produce the required documents, leading the court to insist on reviewing the Case Diary.

 3 Replies

Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate )     17 April 2026

What is there in the mind of Court, cannot be presumed.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     18 April 2026

The court will follow the procedures of law and cannot on the whims of party.

Wait and watch the development.

P. Venu (Advocate)     24 April 2026

The query is too speculative to warrant any suggestion.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register