The landlord sold a property to me, but fraudulently concealed the original property and showed me a different property during registration. When the landlord tried to interfere with the possession of the property described in the sale deed (which I initially believed was the correct, vacant property), I filed a suit for injunction. Later, I came to know the true location of the property based on a survey report, and subsequently filed a new suit for recovery of possession. I did not press the previous injunction suit. In the cause of action for the new suit, we mentioned that the previous suit for injunction was filed when the defendant tried to interfere with the sale deed property, and that we did not press it. After knowing the true location, we filed the new suit based on the survey report for recovery of possession. Here 2 different property shown and another true property but same sale deed
My question
1what is meaning of " subject matter " in order 23 rule 1 (4)
2 Will I be affected by the previous 'not pressed' suit under Order 23 Rule 1(4) CPC since 2 different property but same sale deed and different causèof actions and different relief
