LIVE Course on Transfer Property Law | Price Hike in 4 days | Grab it now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

CoolingWood (engineer)     07 September 2016

Need comments on witness evidence

Hello All,

 

During divorce case, PW.2 satted in cross-examination like below: 

 

1. As the incidents happened in this case are happened 9 years banck hence PW.2 do not remenber. 

 

2. PW.2 never visited matrimonial home of wife and husband who are seeking divorce.

 

3. PW.2 never eye-witnessed any disputes between the wife and husband who are seeking divorce.

 

4. PW.2 never spoken with husband either prior to marriage and after marriage. 

 

5. PW.2 only heard about allegations through phone call made by the wife and PW.2 can not submit the phone numbers of PW.1 and PW.2.

 

Above all statements are part of the cross-examination of PW.2. Does this is enough to say that the PW.2 evidence is not supporting the allegations present in the evidence affidavit of PW.2.



Learning

 2 Replies

Rocky Smith (Instructor @ Calcutta (rockysmith4calcutta@gmail.com))     07 September 2016

These are "Hearsay Evidences" .

It is considered as most weak evidence. 

 

https://www.facebook.com/RockySmith4Calcutta/

CoolingWood (engineer)     08 September 2016

Witness says: 

 

1. As the incidents happened in this case are happened 9 years banck hence PW.2 do not remenber. 

 

then how could this witness prepare the evidence affidavit then came to court to face cross-examination.... is this not enough that evidence affidavit is fabricated ...

 

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading
Start a New Discussion Unreplied Threads



Popular Discussion


view more »




Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query