chandan kumar 29 June 2023

Judge ne lajja bai vs ramsingh 1996 bhag 2 mpvn 142 ka hawala liya hai

Sir meri apeel me jana chahta hoon to is case jiska hawala liya gya hai uska khandan karne wala judgement ki aavashyakta hai latest kripa meri madad kare aisa judgement de jisme 125 me 498a ke pending rehte case khariz hua ho Plz help

Reply Follow

Quick Summary

This discussion concerns the case of 'Lajja Bai vs Ramsingh 1996' (MPVN 142) and its relevance to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, particularly when a 498A case is pending. The user is seeking a judgement that supports dismissing a maintenance case under these circumstances. The provided information clarifies that the Sessions Court's order in the cited case was set aside by the MP High Court, restoring the Trial Court's order for maintenance.

2 Replies

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 29 June 2023

You can contact a local advocate and discuss the issue at length with the local advocate and proceed as recomended

Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate ) 30 June 2023

In the cited judgement order passed by Sessions Court has been set aside by MP High Court and Trial Court order granting maintenance @ Rs. 400/- for wife and Rs. 100/- for son has been restored , what is your interpretation / doubt and applicability in your case ???