Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

sridhar pasumarthy (ADVOCATE)     17 February 2024

Defective investigation of criminal case

Respected Members,

In a case of Section 354D of I.P.C., 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of Lady Victim was recorded by a Male police officer in lieu of Woman Police Officer as contemplated under 2nd Proviso to Section 161 Cr.P.C.

Is it not mandatory to be recorded by Women Police Officer only.  If so, can accused take any advantage out of it.

Pls Reply.  Thanks in advance..  



Quick Summary
This discussion explores a potential procedural flaw in a criminal investigation where a male police officer recorded a victim's statement instead of a female officer, as potentially required by law. Members are seeking clarification on whether this deviation is mandatory and if the accused can leverage this error during trial proceedings. The conversation aims to detail how defence counsel can raise objections based on such procedural irregularities and the potential benefits for the accused.

 2 Replies

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     17 February 2024

It is a matter of trial and the objections can be recorded during trial proceedings for deviation in following the procedures of law during investigation and recording of statement from the victim or defacto complainant.

1 Like

sridhar pasumarthy (ADVOCATE)     17 February 2024

Pls elaborate in what way defence counsel can take objection and how it would be helpful to accused

 

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register