Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Krishna   02 April 2025

Crpc 125 order suspension

A family court has given order in a Miscellaneous petition directing husband to pay amount to wife as educational expenses of the child in September ,2022.As the amount is in lakhs and very high, the husband approached the high court and got suspension order . Suspension till further orders in October, 2022.
In 2024 June the family court has issued non bailable warrants against the husband for non payment of ordered amount. 
The husband side argued that the suspension is still pending as per Supreme court judgement in Allhabad high court advocates association vs state of UP 2024.
While wife side argued that as per Asian resurfacing Road agency vs CBI, the stay vacated automatically after 6 months. 
Husband side said that Asian resurfacing Road agency vs CBI judgement is valid only for stay in civil and criminal trials. The suspension is over order and not on trial.
The family court while recalling the NBWs has ordered to pay the amount. 
Which argument is correct?

Husband side also argued by the time family court arguments the supreme court over ruled automatic vacation of stay in 2024.



Quick Summary
This discussion explores a legal conflict surrounding a CRPC 125 order for child educational expenses. A husband obtained a suspension order from the High Court, but the Family Court later issued non-bailable warrants. The core debate centres on whether the suspension order automatically expired after six months, as per one Supreme Court ruling, or remains valid, as argued by the husband citing another judgment. The Family Court initially ordered payment despite the suspension, but the situation remains contentious regarding the validity of the stay.

 3 Replies

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     02 April 2025

So, what do you want to say by posting this information here?.

The automatic vacation of stay order by supreme court after six months has been over ruled by the apex court hence the stay order which has not been vacated yet, stands good. 

If the family court is still proceeding by directing you  to pay the arrears amount despite subsisting stay order, you may approach high court once again with a revision petition to direct the family court to stall the proceedings in this regard till further orders. 

Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate )     03 April 2025

When you are aware about judgement(s) / citation(s) on the subject matter, despite the fact that some of the judgment(s) have been over ruled,  what is the purpose of posting this query ?

Shweta Bharti (--)     19 May 2026

Hello, Inquirer.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register