Can S. 420 /465 / 467 / 468 / 471 IPC be filled after withdrawal of a Civil and or CrPC Suits

Dear Nilesh, if your wife suffered from epilepsy and did not disclose it, so you simply opted to divorce, that being your personal choice but if someone's wife after marriage discovered that her husband has erectile dysfunction then what in the normal course of action she should do?Indian wives treat their husbands as semi-gods but we treat them as slaves.Even if she had that desease and did not disclose it, the choice may not be her alone but instead of giving her solace or treatment you started cruelity and kicked her out then what would that poor and hapless lady would go for?She has every right to demand for the maintenance because she lost her verginity by becoming your legal half.In Hindu terminology an ARDHANGINI. so would you simply cut your ANG or treat it first, if it became infected?Pay her dues or face the music of law but that would not be so easy for her too.She has to undergo another hardship in the court.In such cases neither wife wins nor the husband but real winners are the advocates on both sides who ruin two families by their tactful moves.Please comfort her and treat her, epilepsy may be incurable but it can be controlled by your sweetness.Sorry being harsh.Take care and god bless you.

@ Om Prakash Dausia


1. You are basically still 'seeking redemption' here is my observation after reading to your 16:49 posting which I comment now. Also you are blowing your own trumpet by highlighting your 4 yrs. RI being truthful to some acts which you committed in past, yet carrying forward venom against the same (prof.) Advocate community whom you commented upon to some D. Arun Kumar in the above post. At the end sinfully at 17:50 you are judgmental about some posting of Nilesh with same ingredients that you lovingly preached to some D. Arun Kumar!


So where all these are leading to? Think in introspection before commenting as third party to some defunct posts.

2. One side you are trying to straighten some D. Arun Kumar (now banned from LCI) who gave his perspective to some post of Krishrane and now re-read your own analogy given to Nilesh, man what was that?. Is it not your perspective as in opinion so don’t you expect Newton’s Third Law of Motion now……….

3. Well did you not plead guilty as in plea bargaining then what was so offensive you found in some D. Arun Kumar’s that post where he gave illustration of probable Q & A on plea bargaining to posts author who himself is admitting to telling lie in Court? Now, are you not talking offensively about prof. advocates in your post to Nilesh which at one point of time you found so repulsive just bze some D. Arun Kumar used the word “kick” instead of Queens English (means politically correct English) “terminate services………..”

4. Are you still not in medieval mindset talking of only duties of husband in last post overlooking that same duties a wife also have as in haves and have-nots!

A advise to you, let authors to a post be encouraged to rebut a reply as it was a particular replier who replied to a author post and you are just a third party to all these conversation just like me at this very instance.

A prof. person servives on being thick skinned and ld. Advoctes are no exception to such Rule and I'm not sure where a HR Executive stands in all these.


However, all above being besides the point all your postings are well appreciated including Expert sections ones, you are man of true blue hearts.


Best wishes.  

sir i m also facing  same pro..  the certiflition was given from the college  , and after   it came that it is fake  the sign is also of  prinicple