Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

JS Murthy (none)     07 September 2014

Telecom cases - consumer forums jurisdiction

https://www.dnaindia.com/money/money-consumer-forum-asks-bharti-airtel-limited-to-pay-rs-5-lakh-to-customer-for-misconduct-2016796

 

Good judgment awarding Just Compensation in the light of the bluff telecom companies able to play jurisdiction issue (after 2009 SC judgment that took away consumers right fighting cases in Consumer Forums/Commissions)

Irked by the "mischief conduct" of its executives towards customers, aconsumer forum has asked Bharti AirtelLimited to pay Rs five lakh, saying it was a fit case for "punitive damages" to teach the company a "lesson".

The New Delhi Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, presided over by C K Chaturvedi, asked the company to pay Rs two lakh to complainant Jasmeet Singh Puri, the CEO of a private firm, who had alleged that executives of the firm had harassed him by repeatedly asking him to pay the bills he had already paid.

"After considering the material, particularly the act of discontinuing services despite payments and raising bills again shows a lack of coordination between different department of OP1 (company) whereby complainant is made to suffer; all due to internal mismanagement as well as lackadaisical attitude of OP1 executives towards the very people who provides a market for their services," the forum said.

"We hold that it is a fit case for punitive damages to teach OP1 a lesson, so that its executives are disciplined and deterred from such behaviour to innocent consumers," it said in a judgement passed on September 4.



Learning

 2 Replies

Kumar Doab (FIN)     07 September 2014

>>> @ Mr. J S Murhty: 

Many Thanks!

Pls keep on posting such useful threads.


>>> The Complete Decision can be accessed at and is attached....

Jasmeet Singh Puri VERSUS   1. Bharti Airtel Limited,2. Bank of Baroda

https://164.100.72.12/ncdrcrep/judgement/81214090510273532864913%2028784%2004.htm


>>> The approach adopted is tactical to extract amounts from citizens as majority do not approach courts of Law.


>>> The executives/agents/employees are under instruction from their masters to work in set fashion................................or loose their jobs............................otherwise which employee shall offer his neck....................


>>> The decision is Imp in its own sense since it pertains to Fixed Line connection with internet..................of a private telecom company................


Attached File : 374004942 jasmeet singh puri vs bharti airtel ltd.docx downloaded: 77 times

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     08 October 2014

I join Kumar Doab in thanking you for such useful threads in public interest. Keep up the good works.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register