Recently, in kanaiyalal lalchand sachdev & ors. Vs. State of
“21. In our opinion, therefore, the high court rightly dismissed the petition on the ground that an efficacious remedy was available to the appellants under section 17 of the act. It is well-settled that ordinarily relief under articles 226/227 of the constitution of
A. Adjudication of writ petition involves any complex and disputed questions of facts and whether they can be satisfactorily resolved;
B. The petition reveals all material facts;
C. The petitioner has any alternative or effective remedy for the resolution of the dispute;
D. Person invoking the jurisdiction is guilty of unexplained delay and laches;
E. Ex facie barred by any laws of limitation;
F. Grant of relief is against public policy or barred by any valid law; and host of other factors." (capitals supplied)
Note: the views expressed are my personal and a view point only.
Narendra sharma, consultant (legal)
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
Tags :Constitutional Law