LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


The Supreme Court of India, has held, in recent judgment,on OCTOBER 06, 2016.

A Hindu son can divorce his wife for the cruelty of trying to pry him away from his “pious obligation” to live with his aged parents and provide shelter to them.

Insisting her husband to live separately from his parents is a western thought alien to our culture and ethos, observed Justice Anil R.Dave, who wrote the judgment. 

The court was confirming the divorce of a Karnataka-based couple in a recent judgment. Married in 1992, the lower court granted the husband divorce after he alleged cruelty on his wife’s part. He quoted instances of her constant suspicions about him having illegal affairs with a maid. It was later found that no such maid as described by the wife ever worked in the couple’s home

In another instance, the apex court found that the wife had attempted to commit suicide but was rescued in the nick of time. She wanted to separate the man from his parents who were dependent on his income.

LCI Learning

However, the High Court had set aside the decree of divorce, saying the wife had a “legitimate expectation” to see her husband’s income used for her and not his family members.

Shuddering at the thought of the legal tangles in which the “poor husband” would have found himself caught in had she succeeded in committing suicide, the Supreme Court concluded: “The mere idea with regard to facing legal consequences would put a husband under tremendous stress.”

In India, generally people do not subscribe to the western thought, where, upon getting married or attaining majority, the son gets separated from the family, the court said. In normal circumstances, a wife is expected to be with the family of the husband after the marriage.

“She becomes integral to and forms part of the family of the husband and normally without any justifiable strong reason, she would never insist that her husband should get separated from the family and live only with her,” Justice Dave observed.

“It is not a common practice or desirable culture for a Hindu son in India to get separated from his parents on getting married at the instance of the wife, especially when the son is the only earning member in the family. A son, brought up and given education by his parents, has a moral and legal obligation to take care and maintain the parents, when they become old and when they have either no income or have a meagre income,” Justice Dave wrote.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.3253 OF 2008
NARENDRA … APPELLANT
VERSUS
K. MEENA … RESPONDENT
.J. (ANIL R. DAVE)
 J. (L. NAGESWARA RAO)
NEW DELHI
OCTOBER 06, 2016.


"Loved reading this piece by Kumar Doab?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"






Tags :


Category Family Law, Other Articles by - Kumar Doab 



Comments

9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

Every Constitution of any country is a living document, unlike law makers statutes one needs to realize. so Constitutional amendments are not that easy. In the USA about 11000 + constitutional amendments were proposed in the congress, but only 26 are there, all of you know why perhaps you may know if you get into probity in the American constitution . See today how Mr Trump is struggling with all his foul speeches on election to the office of the US Presidency, though he is a nominated republican. How President Mr. Obama asking him not to get into whining by saying , the election would be rigged and the like. Obviously, you need control on the freedom of speech too, is it not?


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

You could have known why there is a vertical split is happening in SP party in the UP? Is it some progressive thought. Obviously not. But some culture problems. CM Akhilesh Yadav was asked by Mulyam singh yadav to touch the feet of Satyapal yadhav why? What idea it is ? Is it some Australian thought where Akhilesh seems to have spent some years of education. Obviously not. But culture taboo of Yadhav elders fair thought followed time immemorial.


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

SVR sir. Articles are not that easy to be understood. After all every Article contruction came up after studying the the Indian culture as it is. It is said when I was at Plymouth in MA the USA, i came to know how the Americans appreciate the red indian culture and how they preserve the very culture. We in India 'neither we are here nor there type we see today, that is the problem. After all you call yourself as 'Yadav' or 'Kadam' why don't you change the idea of castes? you will not just because you get some caste benefits; so you cling, you need some benefits not any sense of obligations to a culture based system so we get into problems....


9 years ago S.V. Rajan

Dr.GB, The learned Judges after evaluating the facts and pin pointing the geographical society (like western /Indian subcontinent etc.,) ancient/past and present the Indian brides have become part and parcel of the grooms family after the marriage. It is not Bad at law as you opined by quoting the articles equality on gender which irrelevant and absurd, I suppose! The Learned Judges reserved their judgements upon analyzing the element of truth in the given case which has to be lauded in spite they are the masters in the Articles. In a lighter sense if the bride becomes the position of the grooms' parents(One day or other they have to be) then the brides must realized the ordeals of their husbands it seems.


9 years ago amma shetty

Great News! Is there any punishable offence if Children force the deceased wife to take equal share of percentage in the assets left by her husband vs. her legal rights if there is no Will made by her husband before his death?


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

Any way it is ideal once married the couple can have their own new home away from both parents, If parents need to be protected the relevant couple need to help them with substantial allowance to the parents to live peacefully, neither spouse can object could be sensible, that way sec 125 need to be protected under CrPC. is my considered view,


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

In fact this judgement of SC needs a curative petition; as it obviously ill balanced reasoning. why a bride need to stay with groom's parents; after all the bride is as well a equal citizen under Art 5. Besides it imbalances very Art 14, 15, and 21; you cannot quote some traditional ideas of girl moving to groom's hse for ever while you say groom need to stay with his parents. Obviously bad in law.


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

Please read instead of CJ Warren , as CJ John Marshall. sorry for error. fact is any law making is to be based on idea of leadership, a right brain activity, that is more an 'art' than a science; science is some managing something of a left brain activity. Leadership is always based on some 'great' philosophy behind, like in any religion like 'say' Buddhism (an enlightened thought process). So that is obviously an Art. Our law makers are not just great leaders , but some kind of managers, right from 'Ministers', They work on 'first things first kind ' activity in managing , might be it is wrong too from the independent Will of political leadership, obviously based on 'independent Will' thought that way political party is formed, when too many parties work in a coalition, Leadership is dead but just some management is there. Management sans Leadership Independent Will will obviously is good for Nothing. that way many legislations undergo too many amendments. Amendment means , 'earlier statute ' lacks something so called 'important correction'; Obviously most statutes invariably irrelavent, like see Muslim Mullahs interpreted 'Koran' (a philosophy) based on a some great thought. But Mullahs interpret they try to manage the Koran, that way 'Qura' is mutilated and misunderstood. That more and more confusions as every interpretation many a time falls into the trap of misunderstanding' that way the 'oral thalq' thrice is considered by Mullahs as great but what is the basis, he cannot explain, but simply say 'Qurah' says, Qurah never said Oral thalaq is great thought; so the muslim countries made 'oral thalaq - thrice' is nothing and cannot be taken for granted, that way Shah Banoo case was decided by Bombay High court then, confirmed by S C; but Congress govt just to appease 'Mullahhs',the Congress govts did not allow Shah Banoo case to take precedence, just because congress was managing with no 'Leadership' thought...like that Leadership obviously an Art, but congress management idea was to get its idea of 'first things first' that is vote bank of muslims just because most muslims being followers of half learned Mullahs just do what Mullahs say, that way Congress was managing tp corner Muslim votes, so too so too SP, BSP and like parties. So practically most statutes mostly irrelevant indeed. so the idea of Judicial review came in basically in the past in all advanced democracies.


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

You create by your so called statutes you create more and more confusion, see you allowed in schools the teenager children need be taught about the sex education , what it did? You know children started using contraceptives as per latest reports; besides what further it did , the same so called idea of sex education in the juvenile minds to try rapes, that way rapes increased , why fathers rape their own daughter so also blood brothers, besides others, thanks to your so called 'immature' law making abilities of law makers; then rapes by 'stalkings' then led to murders by your own so called 'punishment threats, what law making it is tell me friends?


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

See here, you want the parents need to be protected, okay better see the sec 125 of Cr.P.C is enough to take care, make it the parents need to be protected in the level you live, that is enough, why force the newly married couples need to live under one roof? is it not??


Show All (19) (Login required)


You are not logged in . Please login to post comments.

Click here to Login / Register