LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


A cheque is defined under the Negotiable instrument act and if a cheque is bounced and liability on cheque is not discharged,it creates an offence under section 138 NI act, now the presumption under section 139 of the NI act  is a rebuttable presumption and that can be discharged by the accused if he can show there is no legally enforceable debt at the time cheque was issued. Now security cheque is on the different footing than ordinary cheque, but security cheque is still a cheque it attracts provisions of s. 138 and 139 though it can be countered. Basically a security cheque is issued to ensure the performance of the contract and in case there is a breach the security cheque can be realized. Now does breach of contracts creates a legally enforceable debt this needs to be tested and held by various case laws that

If the cheques were taken only as security for prompt repayment and those cheque were not indischarge of any debt or liability. The date on which cheques were taken there was no debt or liability Accused cannot be prosecuted under NI 138.

In the case of Joseph Vilangadan (Supra) the facts were that the Directors had given certain cheques as refundable security deposits to ensure due performance of their work. In the given facts and circumstances it was held that there did not exist any debt or liability and the cheques were given solely for the purpose of security and hence no action under section 138 of the Act was maintainable.

If there was no debt or liability at that point of time while issuing the cheque

In Shreyas Agro Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Chandrakumar S.B. on 16 February, 2006

LCI Learning

The very scheme of procedure adopted shows that the cheques are not issued in respect of any current existing ascertained liability. The words "for discharge of any debt or other liability" inSection 138 of N.I. Act should be interpreted to mean current existing or past ascertained liabilities. The cheque issued in respect of future liabilities not in existence as on the date of cheque would not attract prosecution Under Section 138 of N.I. Act.

So even if security cheque is bounced the prosecution can be initiated and only defence is that there was no legally enforceable debt.

Thanks & Regards,

Nitish Banka

(Advocate Supreme Court)

nitish@lexspeak.in


"Loved reading this piece by Nitish Banka?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"






Tags :


Category Criminal Law, Other Articles by - Nitish Banka 



Comments

9 years ago Ompal Aggarwal

Cheques asked to submit as security are blank nothing is written on that except signature of the party. Ur views in such cases


9 years ago SAINATH DEVALLA

Excellent informative article by the author


9 years ago vetrivelan.s

pls read as Publish. excuse the typing error.


9 years ago vetrivelan.s

Sir, Thanks a lot. its an excellent information, kindly punlish such useful artical with case laws.


9 years ago k.n.VIJAYAKUMAR

I supply goods to A on 1-1-2016. for 100 Rs. I collect undated cheque from A which was issued by his bank in say AUG 2015. If this chq bounces -according to you will not attract 138 . Is this your line of argument?


9 years ago rajuchowdappa

Sir kindly mention the latest case laws that will be help to all beloved advocates


9 years ago Dr. Devidas G Maley

A very good and informative article. Congratulations and thanks to the author.


9 years ago Adv. Dhamale

A case never though can be filed...only evidence will find the status of applicability of 138...anyways how many cases reach decision and how many are settled.. Is also relevant to that extent




You are not logged in . Please login to post comments.

Click here to Login / Register