Regarding the amendment whether necessary to make a person a
Anonymous
(Querist) 04 February 2019
This query is : Resolved
Sir
Transplantation of Human Organs Act 1994 has been adopted by state of Haryana
It comes with amendment in 2011 and called as transplantation of human organs (amendment) act, 2011
But haryana state has not amended the act till date with new amendments in 2011
Now in 2018
A complaint filed against doctor in haryana under the provisions as per amendment in 2011 by central government
Whether the accused doctor can take benift that the crime for which he is facing the complaint as per provisions of the amendment in 2011 by central government is not amended in haryana till date and no crime is committed by him
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 05 February 2019
The Act passed by Parliament shall prevail over the State enactment.
Anonymous
(Querist) 05 February 2019
Under what provision I can say that once we have adopted the parent act the ammendment will automatically be considered does't matter whether state has amended the act or not
Anonymous
(Querist) 05 February 2019
Under what provision I can say that once we have adopted the parent act the ammendment will automatically be considered does't matter whether state has amended the act or not
H.M.Patnaik
(Expert) 05 February 2019
Pl. go through the operational jurisdiction of the Act referred to at above to find out its applicability to your state.
P. Venu
(Expert) 05 February 2019
What are the facts? What is the issue?
Anonymous
(Querist) 06 February 2019
There is an act transplantation of human organs act 1994 by central government which was adopted by state in 1996.
This act was amended in in 2011 somehow it is not amended by state till today
Fact is that accused want to get benift that a certain act done by him in 2018 is not crime or not specified in act of 1994 but it is crime in amendment of 2011
Now at this stage where state has not adopted the amendment of 2011 till today whether the accused can get benift of not amending the act and go out easily with free hands just by saying that 1994 act is applicable upon him and the act done by him is not specified or not a crime in that act
