Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   08 January 2021 at 21:54

Deposition through virtual mode from usa under 13b(2)

My daughter has depose her statement through video-conferencing from USA. What is the ways she can be identified herself when in the order passed by honorable court on 23.12.2021 for deposition through VC on 12th Jan,21 has not mentioned anything. At present there is no walk-in access at Indian consulate.
What is the other alternative that can be adopted to satisfy or otherwise acceptable

Anonymous   08 January 2021 at 18:59

Fcgpr ca certificate

new company is formed required ca calauation certificate for fcgpr asap

thanks

sudhir tataraju   08 January 2021 at 16:50

Salecumgpa agent sold in 2006 after principal death valid?

Hello Honarable Lawyer!

Will Reg. Agr. of Sale cum GPA claimant sold property in 2006 after principal death is a valid?

Iam planning to buy a plot this month i.e. 2021 Jan.

In 2004 Person-B done the registration of "Agreement of sale cum GPA" executant Person-A. In that 2004 agreement its mentioned that Person-A giving full rights to Person-B to sell the property taking amount of 40,000rs.

In 2006 after the death of Person-A in 2005, Person -B sold the property to Person-C with saledeed transaction and registered same. Is this is a valid transaction?

Should I buy the plot from Person-C ? as its been already 14 years since Person-C bought paying money to Person-B.

Am afraid that what if Person-A family file case with death Certificate of Person-A as G.P.A is invalid if person-A dies! Since person-B had Agreement of Sale Cum G.P.A I am thinking to buy.

FYI 2010 Person-C paid L.R.S and regularized the plot but didn't paid or applied for V.L.T(vacant land tax).

And am aware that GPA claimant cant sell property after 2011 oct as per supreme court.

rupendra jain   08 January 2021 at 02:03

Information about mutation

Dear Experts,

I have purchase a new flat two years ago. After 1 year of purchase, we got to know that fourth floor in not there in sanction plan. It is there is "as made" plan. Unfortunately I am in fourth floor.
Can I still do mutation of my flat? The other flat owners at 2nd and 3rd floor are also concerned whether they can do mutation.

Can you please advise both quieres? What are my legal options?

I forgot to mention that we are requesting builder to provide completion certificate but he is not providing this, neither denying to provide.

Anonymous   07 January 2021 at 13:23

compulsory aadhar card for purchasing sim

To
The learned professional colleague
Recently i went to a mobile store to purchase a SIM.
The salesman told me that I have to bring my original Aadhar card for linking the SIM with Aadhar.
I told him that as far as my knowledge as per Supreme court directive linking aadhar with sim is now not mandatory.
But the salesman told me that without Aadhar ling the SIM will not be activated.
My queries are
1. Is it mandatory to link Aadhar with SIM?
2. Whether my perception on The honorable Supreme Court judgement is Correct?
3. If my perception is correct then where I have to lodge complain against the telecom company?
Regards
Abhijit Majumder

Gopalaswamy   07 January 2021 at 12:48

Clarrification

I am not sure whether my earlier querry was drew attention or not ,so I am repisting
The issues is regarding a probated will.I am,the respondant .The case came up for hearing during 2019 .The plaintiff did not appear Only his advocate appearedand I appeared once .The information received was announcement of dismissal on 5/1/21.The plaintiff appeared on 5/1/21 and submitted some document as E1to6 which are correspondence between him and testator, inrespect of his claim..The will got partioned between the two and an affidavit was drawn-by an Advocate having taken pocession of indivitual share during 1996 .I am in,full enjoiment of my share till date .The testator has not changed the will and registered probated .Clarrification is sought now whether the court will take or consider the correspondance between the plaintiff or ignore and act as per will which was probated.The will was probated by plaintiff .
The present indication,in court is judgement on,28/1/21.Kindly,clarrify what is the law .will or correspondance Thanking you,

Gopalaswamy   07 January 2021 at 12:45

Clarrification

I am not sure whether my earlier querry was drew attention or not ,so I am repisting
The issues is regarding a probated will.I am,the respondant .The case came up for hearing during 2019 .The plaintiff did not appear Only his advocate appearedand I appeared once .The information received was announcement of dismissal on 5/1/21.The plaintiff appeared on 5/1/21 and submitted some document as E1to6 which are correspondence between him and testator, inrespect of his claim..The will got partioned between the two and an affidavit was drawn-by an Advocate having taken pocession of indivitual share during 1996 .I am in,full enjoiment of my share till date .The testator has not changed the will and registered probated .Clarrification is sought now whether the court will take or consider the correspondance between the plaintiff or ignore and act as per will which was probated.The will was probated by plaintiff .
The present indication,in court is judgement on,28/1/21.Kindly,clarrify what is the law .will or correspondance Thanking you,

Rahul Verma   07 January 2021 at 11:30

Is gpa legal

Hi, Actually i have purchased 1170sqft property in Haryana Bhupani. As registry is stopped right now the dealer has done the GPA for me from Gaziabad court in which he has mentioned the there is 18 foot road on west of the property and 18 foot road on south of the property. I have two query the first one is i he has decreased the length of the road on the south of the property from 18 foot to 15 foot and said that there is no need to change in GPA and my second query is is GPA legal ?

Anonymous   07 January 2021 at 07:01

Survey number issue

I purchased 100 yards on 2014 survey number is 220 and all the link documents related it are correct right form the first transcation from 2000, but suddenly this month someone claims that the survey number of the purchased land is 218 which is supposed to be his land and asking us to settle the issue with paying him again to claim ourself as the rightful owner. The purchased land is having the boundary wall build from the first transaction too. What are the chance if it is forwarded to court and/or who should be the rightful owner.

Stephen   06 January 2021 at 22:20

Plaintiff options in un executed decree vs defendants appeal

Dear Respected Sir,

I had won suite for money recovery in a cheating of property and also applied a caveate in high court. While I have not applied for decree execution yet as I am still tracing defendants correct address and property details to be used a attachment. Meanwhile defendant has raised an appeal.

I am seeking your advice and next steps help.

a) is it allowed that defendant can raise appeal while he has not paid any amount to the court including my court fee
b) As I have won the case with proof of prior case judgement and orders which defendant acknowledge during cross examination. Therefore what legal steps I need to take such that defendant dosent block do decree execution.

Thanks
Stephen