Transcript and tape recorded converstion

mala (Querist) 02 March 2015 This query is : Resolved
wITH DUE RESPECT TO ALL AND GREETING OF THE DAY

Sir
I hv been convicted soely on the basis of some transcript and recorded conversaion produced by the prosecution and they themselveslf admit that this transcript and conversation so recorded were in their office Hence i hv zppealed to the High court
I need clarification and guidance on these aspects

1. Tape recorded conversation
As per law laid down by hon SC and Various High Courts in its in their catena of judgements like Paarasurmireddy etcetc

wherein it is stated that the "MAKER OF THE RECORDED CONVERSATION MUST IDENTIFY THE VOICE"

OR BY ANY OTHERS WHO ARE COMPETENT TO IDENTIFY THE VOICE

NOW my question is

Qn1 Who can be called as the maker of the voice
Is it correct to suggest that in the present case the person as per the case of the prosecution who spoke to me can be said to be the maker of the recordings
only he can identify the person to shom he had spoken to n telephone
and if that person is neither produced as a witness or as accused before the court and I denied the voice coupled with those PWs who identified the voice have neither met me or seen me on any earlier occassion prior thereto . Furthermore when the court itself returned its findings that anything comes in absence of the person either as a witness or accused becomes hearsay evidence and is not admissible

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Jayashree Hariharan (Expert) 02 March 2015
You should have asked for forensic intervention to identify the voice.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 04 March 2015
Full case file has to be referred, consult local lawyer.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate Online

(Expert) 05 March 2015
You may consult another lawyer in case your own does not responds properly but carry all the relevant papers while seeking clarification on the subject issues.